Re: svn commit: r962515 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main: java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/polynomials/ java/org/apache/commons/math/exception/ java/org/apache/commons/math/random/ java

On 9 July 2010 18:35, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >> >     public PolynomialFunction(double c[]) { >> >         super(); >> >         if (c.length < 1) { >> > -            throw >> > MathRuntimeException.createIllegalArgumentException(LocalizedFormats.EMPTY_POLYNOMIALS_COEFFICIENTS_ARRAY); >> > +    

Re: svn commit: r962515 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main: java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/polynomials/ java/org/apache/commons/math/exception/ java/org/apache/commons/math/random/ java/o

> >     public PolynomialFunction(double c[]) { > >         super(); > >         if (c.length < 1) { > > -            throw > > MathRuntimeException.createIllegalArgumentException(LocalizedFormats.EMPTY_POLYNOMIALS_COEFFICIENTS_ARRAY); > > +            throw new > > NotStrictlyPositiveException(L

Re: svn commit: r962306 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main: java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/interpolation/ java/org/apache/commons/math/exception/ java/org/apache/commons/math/util/ resour

> I don't how we can use the same arguments in both the general and > specific messages and later combine them together. The place holders {0}, {1}, ... will be replaced by the corresponding argument in both the "specific" and the "general" patterns. > How is this different > from a more complete

Re: svn commit: r962306 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main: java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/interpolation/ java/org/apache/commons/math/exception/ java/org/apache/commons/math/util/ resour

Le 09/07/2010 01:45, er...@apache.org a écrit : > Author: erans > /** {...@inheritdoc} */ > @Override > public String getMessage() { > -return MessageFactory.buildMessage(Locale.US, pattern, arguments); > +final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); > + > +

Re: svn commit: r962515 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main: java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/polynomials/ java/org/apache/commons/math/exception/ java/org/apache/commons/math/random/ java

On 9 July 2010 14:15, wrote: > Author: erans > Date: Fri Jul  9 13:15:28 2010 > New Revision: 962515 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=962515&view=rev > Log: > MATH-361 > > Modified: >     > commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/analysis/polynomials/PolynomialFun

Re: Exclusive broker access

Le 09/07/2010 10:50, Mario Ivankovits (Apache) a écrit : We are sorry we have to inform you that this functionality is not yet implemented, but is planned for the Q1 release in 2019. ;-)) sorry, couldn't resist ... I guess, you wouldn't want your mail sent to commons-dev, no? Ciao, Mario

Re: Exclusive broker access

We are sorry we have to inform you that this functionality is not yet implemented, but is planned for the Q1 release in 2019. ;-)) sorry, couldn't resist ... I guess, you wouldn't want your mail sent to commons-dev, no? Ciao, Mario -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Emmanuel Bourg [mailt

Exclusive broker access

Hi, Is there a way to enforce a per account exclusive access to the broker? For example if a user has an opened connection to the broker, when he opens another connection the first one is automatically closed. Emmanuel Bourg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature