Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=367839&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Building
Started at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 21:32:10 -0700
Finished at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 21:33:07 -0700
Total time: 56s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:14 AM, sebb wrote:
Trying again, because the previous vote thread got nowhere.
Please vote on this so that we can move forward with Nexus, and fix
the current deployment URLs which are not "safe".
Note that components don't have to upgrade immmediately to v16, but
there a
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> MATH-361
>>> MATH-382
>> In the future, please separate commits if possible for separate
>> issues. In this case, a bug was fixed and some exception
>> refactoring was also introduced. These should be separate commits
>
> I know, and I do it whenever possible but I fou
On Jul 5, 2010, at 7:24 PM, sebb wrote:
> Might be worth considering adding the names to the pom.
>
Yes, definitely should do that for those not already there.
Phil
> On 5 July 2010 21:00, Adrian Crum wrote:
>> The Open For Business project faced the same decision when we moved to
>> Apache
Might be worth considering adding the names to the pom.
On 5 July 2010 21:00, Adrian Crum wrote:
> The Open For Business project faced the same decision when we moved to
> Apache. It was decided author information could be found in the commit logs,
> so it was removed without notifying the auth
> > MATH-361
> > MATH-382
>
> In the future, please separate commits if possible for separate
> issues. In this case, a bug was fixed and some exception
> refactoring was also introduced. These should be separate commits
I know, and I do it whenever possible but I found out about the bug
(MATH-
2010/7/5 Xun Long Gui :
> Hi Rahul,
>
> By now, everything of GSoC Visual SCXML project is going well with our
> initial plan. This project have this function list:
> 1. Implement Eclipse GMF based SCXML document visual editor tool;
> 2. Implement Eclipse SCXML document export function;
> 3. Implem
The Open For Business project faced the same decision when we moved to Apache.
It was decided author information could be found in the commit logs, so it was
removed without notifying the authors.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > I think it would be wi
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Xun Long Gui wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> I have added a new issue COMMONSSITE-58 [1] which has an attachment
>> file in JIRA system to add GSoC relative section in Commons Sandbox
>> index page, now i think you c
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=367554&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 11:32:34 -0700
Finished at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 11:33:47 -0700
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I think it would be wise to get the agreement from the people with their
> name behind an @author tag in the code.
>
How exactly do we do that? Send email to old avai...@apache.org and
wait some weeks or months for a response? Most of the original
@authors for these comp
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=367550&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 10:56:50 -0700
Finished at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 10:57:37 -0700
Total time: 47s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
I think it would be wise to get the agreement from the people with their
name behind an @author tag in the code.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 04/07/2010 16:01, Phil Steitz a écrit :
Any objections?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
I still think the current default (the platform default character
encoding) is a bad default. And any of the proposed changes is way
better than the current default and will not cause any problems
anyone, just prevent or solve problems.
What about putting a comment in the javadoc of:
org.apache.co
er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Mon Jul 5 14:10:10 2010
> New Revision: 960602
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=960602&view=rev
> Log:
> MATH-361
> MATH-382
In the future, please separate commits if possible for separate
issues. In this case, a bug was fixed and some
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=367484&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Building
Started at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 07:33:16 -0700
Finished at: Mon 5 Jul 2010 07:34:23 -0700
Total time: 1m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bu
Trying again, because the previous vote thread got nowhere.
Please vote on this so that we can move forward with Nexus, and fix
the current deployment URLs which are not "safe".
Note that components don't have to upgrade immmediately to v16, but
there are a few which want to upgrade and cannot un
On 4 July 2010 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Not here, I did this years ago in [codec]
>
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Seagull Software
> email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
> email: ggreg...@apache.org
> www.seagullsoftware.com
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Steitz
Hi Rahul,
By now, everything of GSoC Visual SCXML project is going well with our
initial plan. This project have this function list:
1. Implement Eclipse GMF based SCXML document visual editor tool;
2. Implement Eclipse SCXML document export function;
3. Implement Eclipse SCXML document import fun
19 matches
Mail list logo
