Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

2010-06-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2010/6/30 Xun Long Gui : > Yeah, it works now :-) > > After i use mvn site:deploy command to deploy the web site content, when i > can see the re-deployed contents on the web site ? several hours ? > Yeah, depending on when you deploy, could be a few minutes or a few hours. Remember to check in c

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

2010-06-29 Thread Xun Long Gui
Yeah, it works now :-) After i use mvn site:deploy command to deploy the web site content, when i can see the re-deployed contents on the web site ? several hours ? 2010/6/29 Rahul Akolkar > 2010/6/28 Rahul Akolkar : > > 2010/6/28 Xun Long Gui : > > >> > >> BTW, is the perms change job on the

Re: [scxml] simple visual editor

2010-06-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Fabrizio Morbini wrote: > Hi, i saw some messages regarding a project developing a visual editor > for scxml as an Eclipse plugin. > > We have written a simple editor for scxml too. it's rough but usable. > It uses the jgraphx library to do the layout of nodes and

Re: [Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > +!  Unreleased code is subject to change, including deletion or > incompatible API change. > What he said! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For ad

Re: [Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread Phil Steitz
James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Gilles Sadowski > wrote: >> Not in an official release since 2.2 isn't out yet. >> > > Well, since the code hasn't been released (it's a new > method/constructor I presume?), I would think that anything new that's > in SVN should be considere

Re: [Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Not in an official release since 2.2 isn't out yet. > Well, since the code hasn't been released (it's a new method/constructor I presume?), I would think that anything new that's in SVN should be considered a work-in-progress. So, I don't

Re: [Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> Is it part of a public API that went out in a release already? [...] > > > Is it OK to perform non backward-compatible changes in code that wasn't > > offcially released yet (i.e. in code tagged with the "@since 2.2" javadoc > > comment)? Not in an official release since 2.2 isn't out yet. >

Re: [Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread James Carman
Is it part of a public API that went out in a release already? What method do you have in mind? On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > Is it OK to perform non backward-compatible changes in code that wasn't > offcially released yet (i.e. in code tagged with the "@since

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-06-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[Math] Backward compatibility

2010-06-29 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. Is it OK to perform non backward-compatible changes in code that wasn't offcially released yet (i.e. in code tagged with the "@since 2.2" javadoc comment)? Best regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@comm

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-ant (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-06-29 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. T

[scxml] simple visual editor

2010-06-29 Thread Fabrizio Morbini
Hi, i saw some messages regarding a project developing a visual editor for scxml as an Eclipse plugin. We have written a simple editor for scxml too. it's rough but usable. It uses the jgraphx library to do the layout of nodes and there are many points that could be improved. Are people intereste

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Basic website up for project and ppt -> xdoc

2010-06-29 Thread Rahul Akolkar
2010/6/28 Rahul Akolkar : > 2010/6/28 Xun Long Gui : >> >> BTW, is the perms change job on the way already? What we need is just wait ? >> > Give it a few days :-) > Try now. -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@co

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

2010-06-29 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Sebb, On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 7:59 AM, sebb wrote: > On 29 June 2010 12:35, Jacob Beard wrote: > I'm not sure that is the problem here, because the "no entry" sign > appears before the pointer leaves the square. I'm observing this behaviour on Firefox as well. I think this is a separate iss

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

2010-06-29 Thread sebb
On 29 June 2010 12:35, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thanks for the feedback! > > I think I know the issue you're talking about. This is a very early > and very simple prototype, so it doesn't do some > things that you might expect it to do with respect to drag-and-drop > behaviour. Specifical

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

2010-06-29 Thread Jacob Beard
Hi Sebb, Thanks for the feedback! I think I know the issue you're talking about. This is a very early and very simple prototype, so it doesn't do some things that you might expect it to do with respect to drag-and-drop behaviour. Specifically, events are only captured by the square/circle element

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

2010-06-29 Thread sebb
On 29/06/2010, sebb wrote: > On 29/06/2010, Jacob Beard wrote: > > Hi Sebb and Rahul, > > > > I believe i know why it wasn't working. The code relies on a console > > API, which is always present in Chrome, but only present in Firefox > > when debugging with Firebug. I just added a bit of

Re: [all][scxml-js] Google Summer of Code Update 3

2010-06-29 Thread sebb
On 29/06/2010, Jacob Beard wrote: > Hi Sebb and Rahul, > > I believe i know why it wasn't working. The code relies on a console > API, which is always present in Chrome, but only present in Firefox > when debugging with Firebug. I just added a bit of code to emulate the > API where it is not a