Re: [scxml-eclipse] Managing generated code in SVN

2010-06-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Xun Long Gui wrote: > Hi Rahul, > > Deleting files in SVN server last time is due to my lapse operation, > sorry for that :-( OK, thanks for clarifying, please be careful not to delete going forward. > In fact, pattern in (B) is not avaiable, we can not help d

Re: [scxml-eclipse] Managing generated code in SVN

2010-06-10 Thread Xun Long Gui
Hi Rahul, Deleting files in SVN server last time is due to my lapse operation, sorry for that :-( In fact, pattern in (B) is not avaiable, we can not help developers generate all the necessary code by theirselves because we can only generate basic source code and we must change source code by hand

[lang3] StringUtils.equals*

2010-06-10 Thread Matt Benson
Should(n't) these methods call toString() before comparing CharSequence arguments of different RT types since CharSequence makes no claims regarding equals methods? ObjectUtils.equals() can call .equals(), but IMHO the principle of least surprise would dictate that StringUtils ensure that

[scxml-eclipse] Managing generated code in SVN

2010-06-10 Thread Rahul Akolkar
The generated code needs to be better managed with respect to SVN updates. As an example of a pattern we don't want to see, r953073 [1] deletes a number of (previously) generated files. Subsequently, r953075 [2] adds back some of those files after regenerating based on changes to the model. Such a

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-06-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

Re: [math] StatUtils handling of zero length arrays - MATH-373

2010-06-10 Thread Phil Steitz
Bill Barker wrote: > Currently StatUtils.sum(double []) (as well as most other statistics > that operate on arrays) returns NaN on a zero length array. As pointed > out in the Jira issue, this is not the conventional treatment of a > summation over the empty set (which would return zero) in the >

Re: [math] StatUtils handling of zero length arrays - MATH-373

2010-06-10 Thread sebb
On 10/06/2010, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would count this as a bug fix rather than a compatibility break. (my vote > is non-binding, of course) > I agree that the current behaviour is wrong. Unfortunately, the current behaviour is documented in the Javadoc, so it would be a compatibility break.

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-06-10 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue