Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread Bill Barker
-- From: "sebb" Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:57 PM To: "Commons Developers List" Subject: Re: [Math] What about issue 361? On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded > >

Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread sebb
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded > > > on April 1, concerning this issue: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 > > > > > > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"? > > > > > > >

Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > > [...] > > > > > > Not sure why you need multiple jars. > > > > To enable runtime selection of the L10N implementation, letting the > > user > > choose whether he wants to depend on the CAL10N external library or > > whether > > he is happy with the default (English) message text. > > I thi

Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread luc . maisonobe
- "Gilles Sadowski" a écrit : > > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've > uploaded > > > on April 1, concerning this issue: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 I'm sorry, but I simply didn't find time. I am very busy these times and will not find

Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded > > on April 1, concerning this issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 > > > > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"? > > > > Apache does have a concept of lazy consensus, but that applie

Re: [Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread sebb
On 27/04/2010, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > > There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded > on April 1, concerning this issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 > > Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"? > Apache does have a concept of

Re: [io] ant patterns ?

2010-04-27 Thread nicolas de loof
Cool, will try to find some time to provide a patch based on existing IO code 2010/4/27 Niall Pemberton > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > Hi > > > > is there any plan to support Ant-style patterns in commons-io > > FileUtils.listFiles() ? > > Ant patterns are simp

Re: [io] ant patterns ?

2010-04-27 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: > Hi > > is there any plan to support Ant-style patterns in commons-io > FileUtils.listFiles() ? > Ant patterns are simple and largely used to match files from various > folders, it could be a nice addition. > We could also get code from Ant

[io] ant patterns ?

2010-04-27 Thread nicolas de loof
Hi is there any plan to support Ant-style patterns in commons-io FileUtils.listFiles() ? Ant patterns are simple and largely used to match files from various folders, it could be a nice addition. We could also get code from Ant itself Cheers, Nicolas

[Math] What about issue 361?

2010-04-27 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. There haven't been any comments about the demo files I've uploaded on April 1, concerning this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-361 Is there an implied policy of "silence gives consent"? Someone had suggested creating a branch. That would be a way to set up a fully working