Re: [SITE] Announce list?

2010-03-11 Thread Henri Yandell
I'm betting it was a search and replace on "Jakarta announcements mailing list". How about using the general Apache announce list? On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:32 PM, sebb wrote: > The page > > http://commons.apache.org/downloads/index.html > > says: > > "We recommend that you subscribe to the Comm

[SITE] Announce list?

2010-03-11 Thread sebb
The page http://commons.apache.org/downloads/index.html says: "We recommend that you subscribe to the Commons announcements mailing list" However, there does not appear to be an announcements list. Should we ask for one? - T

Re: [all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:12 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 AM, sebb wrote: >> > On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a >> >> replacement for the m1 site[3] that we curr

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-03-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-quartz development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

2010-03-11 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=299873&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 11 Mar 2010 19:06:53 -0800 Finished at: Thu 11 Mar 2010 19:12:05 -0800 Total time: 5m 12s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

Re: [all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread sebb
On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a > >> replacement for the m1 site[3] that we currently have - you can see it > >> here: > >> h

Re: [all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a >>> replacement for the m1 site[3] that we currently have - you can see it >>> here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~n

Re: [all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:07 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a >>  replacement for the m1 site[3] that we currently have - you can see it >>  here: >>     http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons/ >> >>  IMO its

Re: [all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread sebb
On 12/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a > replacement for the m1 site[3] that we currently have - you can see it > here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons/ > > IMO its a PITA to have to switch to m1 to build the commons si

[all] Replace Commons Site m1 build with m2 version

2010-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have created a m2 site for Commons[1][2] as (hopefully) a replacement for the m1 site[3] that we currently have - you can see it here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons/ IMO its a PITA to have to switch to m1 to build the commons site and its time to move to m2. * The new releases p

[Lang] Question about Accessible Criteria

2010-03-11 Thread D Sledge
Looking at the method ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor(Constructor), I notice that the method checks if the declaring class is public. Should it not also make sure that the declaring class is either a top-level one or its enclosing class hierarchy are all public, too? D

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi. > >> [...] OLS regression (350 - good catch!) also >> obviously needs to be fixed. Thanks to all for testing. > > There is indeed a difference from what CM 2.0 computed but maybe that it is > not a problem after all, and is just to be expected from the implementatio

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-11 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > [...] OLS regression (350 - good catch!) also > obviously needs to be fixed. Thanks to all for testing. There is indeed a difference from what CM 2.0 computed but maybe that it is not a problem after all, and is just to be expected from the implementation change: some failing tests compar

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan [WAS: Re: [jira] Resolved: (MATH-282) ChiSquaredDistributionImpl.cumulativeProbability > 1]

2010-03-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: >> - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : >> >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>> ] >>> >>> Phil Steitz resolved MATH-282. >>> -- >>

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 14

2010-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Niall, > > can I politely ask for an extended voting period - I would like to have a > closer look on Sunday/Monday ... Sure no problem. Niall > Thanks in advance > > Siegfried Goeschl > > On 11.03.10 14:37, Niall Pemberton wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 14

2010-03-11 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Niall, can I politely ask for an extended voting period - I would like to have a closer look on Sunday/Monday ... Thanks in advance Siegfried Goeschl On 11.03.10 14:37, Niall Pemberton wrote: I have added the new profiles for different java versions suggested by Sebb: http://svn.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 14

2010-03-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have added the new profiles for different java versions suggested by Sebb: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=921843 New diff of the pom.xml can be found at this address: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/commons-parent/trunk/pom.xml?r1=921843&r2=920037&diff_format=h

Re: FW: Compress 1.1 release?

2010-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-03-11, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Stefan/Torsten - you are mainly active on compress right now, how is > the state? So far I don't itend to make any changes before the release, unless Simon's changes are really small. If COMPRESS-18 gets accepted it may need some documentation updates

Re: FW: Compress 1.1 release?

2010-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-03-10, Simon Tyler wrote: > Do we have a date yet for the compress 1.1 release? What Christian said. > Also, is there time to add a couple of minor feature enhancements? I could > do with access to the following: > 1. A public method to check if a ZipArchiveInputStream has a data > des

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-03-11 Thread commons-jelly-tags-quartz development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

Re: FW: Compress 1.1 release?

2010-03-11 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, > Do we have a date yet for the compress 1.1 release? There are a few features > in it that I need to use. not yet, but we already discussed that its time for a new release. Stefan/Torsten - you are mainly active on compress right now, how is the state? I see there are 3 issues open for 1.1.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 14

2010-03-11 Thread sebb
On 11/03/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to release version 14 of the commons-parent pom to fix the > > problems in the last release. The changes are: > > > > 1. Downgrade maven-site-plugin to 2.0.1 (MSITE-464) > > 2. Downgrade maven-javadoc-plugin