Re: [all] commons-parent-13 problems

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: > Unfortunately the upgrade of the maven-site-plugin from 2.0.1 to 2.1 > has caused the site generation

Re: [all] commons-parent-13 problems

2010-03-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Niall, > > Niall Pemberton wrote at Dienstag, 9. März 2010 02:42: > >> Unfortunately the upgrade of the maven-site-plugin from 2.0.1 to 2.1 >> has caused the site generation for Chain, Configuration and DBCP to >> now fail. I'm looking into

Re: [all] commons-parent-13 problems

2010-03-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: Unfortunately the upgrade of the maven-site-plugin from 2.0.1 to 2.1 has caused the site generation for Chain, Configuration and D

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-03-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

[Math] Issue 350

2010-03-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-350 [It's not very descriptive but details will follow soon.] Best, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

[compress] Please Review COMPRESS-18

2010-03-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, I've attached a patch that would fix COMPRESS-18 at the price of sacrificing backwards compatibility of the jar package to COMPRESS-18. I'm not sure whether the impact of that change is small enough to allow the patch in or whether it is not acceptable, that's why I haven't committed it direct

Re: [all] commons-parent-13 problems

2010-03-09 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Niall, Niall Pemberton wrote at Dienstag, 9. März 2010 02:42: > Unfortunately the upgrade of the maven-site-plugin from 2.0.1 to 2.1 > has caused the site generation for Chain, Configuration and DBCP to > now fail. I'm looking into this to see whether its something we can > fix in the componen

Re: [ALL] Compile and Test under different JVM from Maven

2010-03-09 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote at Dienstag, 9. März 2010 02:10: > I've done some investigations. > > Maven can happily compile code with Java 1.3 or 1.4 etc. even when > Maven itself runs under Java 1.5+ [1] > > This can be done by adding the following to the component POM: > > > > > org.apache

Re: [all] Changing maven groupIDs [WAS: [IO] Next version of IO - should this be 2.0?]

2010-03-09 Thread Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz wrote at Sonntag, 7. März 2010 22:03: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg >> wrote: >>> On 2010-03-07 16:45, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On 2010-03-07 12:41, Niall Pemberton wrot

Re: [all] commons-parent-13 problems

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> Unfortunately the upgrade of the maven-site-plugin from 2.0.1 to 2.1 >>> has caused the site generation for Chain, Configuration and DBCP to >>> now fail. >> I fixed DBCP. Will look at the ot

[all] Preparing to release commons-parent 14 pom

2010-03-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
Apologies for this but the problems with commons-parent-13[1] mean that I think we should do another release of commons-parent. The changes[2] so far since the version 13 are: 1. Downgrade maven-site-plugin to 2.0.1 (MSITE-464) 2. Downgrade maven-javadoc-plugin to 2.5 (MJAVADOC-275) 3. Downgrade

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > >> [...] >> >>> With this fix, there are no pending issues for 2.1. Gilles is working on >>> two unscheduled issues. >>> I suggest once he has committed the fixes, we can go ahead to release 2.1. >>> >>> Any thoughts about this ? >> First, let me volunteer to RM.

Re: [math] 2.1 Release plan

2010-03-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > [...] > > > With this fix, there are no pending issues for 2.1. Gilles is working on > > two unscheduled issues. > > I suggest once he has committed the fixes, we can go ahead to release 2.1. > > > > Any thoughts about this ? > > First, let me volunteer to RM. [...] May I suggest to

[math] 2.1 Release plan [WAS: Re: [jira] Resolved: (MATH-282) ChiSquaredDistributionImpl.cumulativeProbability > 1]

2010-03-09 Thread Phil Steitz
luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: > - "Phil Steitz (JIRA)" a écrit : > >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >> ] >> >> Phil Steitz resolved MATH-282. >> -- >> >> Resolution: Fixed >

Re: questions about commons-beanutils

2010-03-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Allen Yuan wrote: > Hi, > There are some questions which I cannot understand about the method > "getAccessibleMethod(Class clazz, Method method)" in the > "org.apache.commons.beanutils.MethodUtils". > > First,what the difference between the "method" returned and the

questions about commons-beanutils

2010-03-09 Thread Allen Yuan
Hi, There are some questions which I cannot understand about the method "getAccessibleMethod(Class clazz, Method method)" in the "org.apache.commons.beanutils.MethodUtils". First,what the difference between the "method" returned and the parameter "method"? Second,in this method if the clazz's modif