Niall Pemberton wrote at Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 02:30:
> In case anyone isn't following the OSGi POOL-60 thread, I have changed
> the budle plugin config and upgraded the bundle plugin version:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/4n5ycmqzw5zdjqhh
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revisi
On 02/25/2010 10:30 PM, sebb wrote:
Quite a few JIRAs are shown as having been fixed for 1.0.1 when
RELEASE-NOTES.txt shows that they were fixed for 1.0.2, for example:
DAEMON-130, DAEMON-132
I assume that the release notes are probably correct.
OK if I fix JIRA?
Sure, go for it.
Since it'
Cool. Thanks Mladen!
-Jack
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Commons Daemon team is pleased to announce the
> commons-daemon-1.0.2 release!
> Version 1.0.2 is primarily a bug fix release.
>
> Source and binary distributions are available for download
> from the Apache Co
In case anyone isn't following the OSGi POOL-60 thread, I have changed
the budle plugin config and upgraded the bundle plugin version:
http://markmail.org/message/4n5ycmqzw5zdjqhh
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=916523
Niall
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Forwarding the current discussion on felix dev list.
> Hopefully this should settle thing a bit.
> Both Karl and Richard says the FAQ looks clear enough (that's the one
> I pointed you to earlier too).
Its annoying since it came up three t
On 25/02/2010, Sebb (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
> ]
>
>
> Sebb updated DAEMON-133:
>
>
> Affects Version/s: 1.0.1
> Fix Version/s: (was: 1.0
The Commons Daemon team is pleased to announce the
commons-daemon-1.0.2 release!
Version 1.0.2 is primarily a bug fix release.
Source and binary distributions are available for download
from the Apache Commons download site:
http://commons.apache.org/daemon/download_daemon.cgi
When downloading,
Forwarding the current discussion on felix dev list.
Hopefully this should settle thing a bit.
Both Karl and Richard says the FAQ looks clear enough (that's the one
I pointed you to earlier too).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Guillaume Nodet
Date: Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 18:01
Subje
On 25/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:40 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 24/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> >>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Guillaime,
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 15:49:
>
>> I just had a lively chat with Peter who kinda agreed that
>> substitutability issue is mostly important for APIs.
>>
>> Please have a look at the Felix FAQ en
Hi Guillaime,
Guillaume Nodet wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 15:49:
> I just had a lively chat with Peter who kinda agreed that
> substitutability issue is mostly important for APIs.
>
> Please have a look at the Felix FAQ entry:
> http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-osgi-
faq.htm
I just had a lively chat with Peter who kinda agreed that
substitutability issue is mostly important for APIs.
Please have a look at the Felix FAQ entry:
http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-osgi-faq.html#ApacheFelixOSGiFAQ-Shouldabundleimportitsownexportedpackages%253F
I haven't written i
Jörg Schaible wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 14:44:
> Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 14:39:
>
> [snip]
>
>> Thx, Jorg. Can you add this to the ticket, pls. Thanks.
>
> Niall has beaten me :)
Maybe we should add this comment also to the wiki for our own remembrance
Phil Steitz wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 14:39:
[snip]
> Thx, Jorg. Can you add this to the ticket, pls. Thanks.
Niall has beaten me :)
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addit
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Guillaume Nodet wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 14:13:
>
>> I'm not a committer on commons, but I've diagnosed the issue we had in
>> ServiceMix with the commons-pool bundles.
>> I can confirm that the patch is the right way to go. If a bundle
>> a
Hi Guillaume,
Guillaume Nodet wrote at Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 14:13:
> I'm not a committer on commons, but I've diagnosed the issue we had in
> ServiceMix with the commons-pool bundles.
> I can confirm that the patch is the right way to go. If a bundle
> acting as a library imports its ow
I'm not a committer on commons, but I've diagnosed the issue we had in
ServiceMix with the commons-pool bundles.
I can confirm that the patch is the right way to go. If a bundle
acting as a library imports its own exported packages, you're bound to
a lot of problems.
This problem applies to all
Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 12:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>> Done. Could take a few hours to replicate.
>>
> Thanks,
> I'll post announce after the sync is done.
> We can even wait 24 hours so that mirrors
> pick the changed content thought.
>
Looks live now. Yes,
Can someone knowledgeable in OSGi header construction please have a
look at POOL-160. IIUC, this applies to all recently released
commons components (unless [pool] is somehow individually borked).
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe,
On 02/25/2010 12:18 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Done. Could take a few hours to replicate.
Thanks,
I'll post announce after the sync is done.
We can even wait 24 hours so that mirrors
pick the changed content thought.
Regards
--
^TM
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems my maven1 installation is screwed
> and I just updated the commons-build/downloads
> page with new daemon release version.
>
> I'd like to update the site and give it couple
> of hours before sending [ANN].
>
> Can somone run update the site?
> According to rel
On 02/25/2010 11:45 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I'm can do it later when I get home if no one else has picked it up by
then - that'll be in about 9 hours.
Thanks,
I've copied the KEYS manually, and that was
the most important thing.
Anyhow the site:deploy should be run
Regards
--
^TM
---
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems my maven1 installation is screwed
> and I just updated the commons-build/downloads
> page with new daemon release version.
>
> I'd like to update the site and give it couple
> of hours before sending [ANN].
>
> Can somone run upda
Hi,
Seems my maven1 installation is screwed
and I just updated the commons-build/downloads
page with new daemon release version.
I'd like to update the site and give it couple
of hours before sending [ANN].
Can somone run update the site?
According to release.html it's
maven site:generate
ant -
24 matches
Mail list logo
