Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Phil Steitz
Benson Margulies wrote: > Thanks. > > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benson Margulies >> wrote: >>> I mistyped. rc4. >> Yes RC4 was the vote that passed: >> >> http://markmail.org/message/nbwdch6vbuev4num >> >> I have renamed th

Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Benson Margulies
Thanks. On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: >> I mistyped. rc4. > > Yes RC4 was the vote that passed: > > http://markmail.org/message/nbwdch6vbuev4num > > I have renamed the tag to MATH_2_0 > > http://svn.apache.

Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I mistyped. rc4. Yes RC4 was the vote that passed: http://markmail.org/message/nbwdch6vbuev4num I have renamed the tag to MATH_2_0 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=909837 Niall > On Feb 13, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Luc

Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Benson Margulies
I mistyped. rc4. On Feb 13, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : Luc - assuming that RC2 was the accepted release candidate than a svn copy is missing?! If the RC2 is correct I can do the svn stuff ... I guess you are right, but Phil will surely be a more re

Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : > Luc - assuming that RC2 was the accepted release candidate than a svn > copy is missing?! If the RC2 is correct I can do the svn stuff ... I guess you are right, but Phil will surely be a more reliable source of information than me on this. Luc > > Siegfried Goesch

Re: [math] why no tag for MATH_2_0?

2010-02-13 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Luc - assuming that RC2 was the accepted release candidate than a svn copy is missing?! If the RC2 is correct I can do the svn stuff ... Siegfried Goeschl Benson Margulies wrote: > There is a tag for RC2 of 2.0, but not for 2.0 itself. > > -

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-daemon-native (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-02-13 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-daemon-native has an issue affecting its community integration. Th