Re: [POOL] get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote at Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2010 20:00: > I'd like to get rid of the suite() methods and TestAll classes in Pool > (as I did recently for DBCP). > > There don't appear to be any missing tests currently, and the Maven > and Ant builds currently run the same number of tests, but using > Te

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2010-01-21 Thread Donald Woods
Since the proposal discussion on Incubator didn't lead to a conclusion on whether this should be an IP Clearance by Commons or a podling for an existing project (which is now dormant) I would like your consideration of allowing us to update the proposal to be sponsored by the Incubator PMC and we'l

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-01-21 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [CODEC] Get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread sebb
On 22/01/2010, Gary Gregory wrote: > Same idea for [CODEC] as the message below RE [POOL] +1 from me (obviously). Note that Surefire allows individual tests to be run by using the -Dtest=TestClassName command-line qualifier, and similar functionality can be implemented in Ant build files - see f

[CODEC] Get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Same idea for [CODEC] as the message below RE [POOL] Gary > -Original Message- > From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 15:06 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [POOL] get rid of suite() and TestAll classes? > > sebb wrote: > > I'd l

Re: [POOL] get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > I'd like to get rid of the suite() methods and TestAll classes in Pool > (as I did recently for DBCP). > > There don't appear to be any missing tests currently, and the Maven > and Ant builds currently run the same number of tests, but using > TestAll and suite() is more effort to ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

2010-01-21 Thread henrib
What's your take on RC6? Is it still a 0+? Cheers Henrib -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Jexl-2-0-tp1016004p1061568.html Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To u

RE: [POOL] get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. Since IDEs like Eclipse let you run all tests in a package or folder I do not think anything would be lost. Gary > -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:00 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [POOL] get rid of suite() and

[SANSELAN] PNG, GIF question

2010-01-21 Thread Mihai Catan
Hi, I'm using Sanselan to get dpi from jpg and jpeg images and work great. I tried to get the same thing for png and gif but soesn't work. File pngFile = new File("png.png"); File gifFile = new File("gif.gif"); File jpgFile = new File("jpg.jpg"); File jpegFile = ne

[POOL] get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

2010-01-21 Thread sebb
I'd like to get rid of the suite() methods and TestAll classes in Pool (as I did recently for DBCP). There don't appear to be any missing tests currently, and the Maven and Ant builds currently run the same number of tests, but using TestAll and suite() is more effort to maintain. WDYT?