[DBCP] Shutting down Derby and the Pool

Hi I am using Apache Derby (embedded) and Apache DBCP to set up a nice pooling data source. My question is how to close this pooling data source properly when the application shuts down. If I am not using DBCP, I can make direct JDBC calls on the Derby data source to shutdown the database - but

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jexl (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-betwixt (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-betwixt has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

On 17/01/2010, henrib wrote: > > Thanks for the thorough review. > > > sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > > ... > > > Hashes and sigs are OK, but .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files are useless > > and should be deleted before release. Not a blocker. > > > > > Rm-ed. > > > > sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > > The RELEA

Re: [DBCP] Missing test cases - get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

sebb wrote: > Just done a comparison of the tests run by Ant and Maven with the > number of Test*.java files and found several discrepancies, including > one test that was not being run by either: > TestDelegatingCallableStatement (that was my fault - oops!). > > Seems to me that these discrepanci

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

Thanks for the thorough review. sebb-2-2 wrote: > > ... > Hashes and sigs are OK, but .asc.md5 and .asc.sha1 files are useless > and should be deleted before release. Not a blocker. > Rm-ed. sebb-2-2 wrote: > > The RELEASE-NOTES.txt file has no information in the "Bugs fixed" section. > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

On 17/01/2010, henrib wrote: > > > The 'mvn release:perform' process puts them there: > > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5/staged/org/apache/commons/commons-jexl/2.0/ > And the site is: > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5/site/ Thanks, I found them. Ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

The 'mvn release:perform' process puts them there: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5/staged/org/apache/commons/commons-jexl/2.0/ And the site is: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5/site/ sebb-2-2 wrote: > > ... > I could only find Maven build output - where

Re: [VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

On 17/01/2010, henrib wrote: > > This is a vote for releasing Commons Jexl 2.0 based on RC5. > > RC5 is here: > http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5 I could only find Maven build output - where are the source and binary archives for those who don't use Maven? > --

[VOTE] Release Jexl 2.0

This is a vote for releasing Commons Jexl 2.0 based on RC5. RC5 is here: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC5 --- [ ] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... Vote will close Friday 2010-01-22 evening

Re: [DBCP] Missing test cases - get rid of suite() and TestAll classes?

sebb wrote: > Just done a comparison of the tests run by Ant and Maven with the > number of Test*.java files and found several discrepancies, including > one test that was not being run by either: > TestDelegatingCallableStatement (that was my fault - oops!). > > Seems to me that these discrepanc