Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences since mine > is an extension that uses annotations to build the Digester, I > proposed the sandbox because is not complete, once terminated I'll > propose to merge the sanbox code in

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

Hi Henry, very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since, fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding a new package that contains the new feature. Thanks a lot for your hint, very appreciated! Best regards, Simo On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Henri Y

Re: svn commit: r896590 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/reflect/ src/main/jav

thanks to you, I appreciate you're reviewing my work :) On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:18 AM, sebb wrote: > All seems to be OK now, thanks. > > On 06/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> thanks a lot, properties fixed with last commits >> >> >>  On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:34 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 06/0

RE: [IO] OK to drop Maven1 build files?

+1. Supporting multiple build systems is a pain and confusing for new developers. Gary > -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 18:45 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [IO] OK to drop Maven1 build files? > > Is it OK to delet

Re: [IO] OK to drop Maven1 build files?

+1 On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 6:45 PM, sebb wrote: > Is it OK to delete the Maven1 build files from IO? The code now > requires Java 1.5. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 - Ant 1.7.0 Java 5

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=266329&projectId=2619 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Error Started at: Tue 5 Jan 2010 01:45:30 -0800 Finished at: Tue 5 Jan 2010 01:46:32 -0800 Total time: 1m 2s Build Trigger: Schedule B

[IO] OK to drop Maven1 build files?

Is it OK to delete the Maven1 build files from IO? The code now requires Java 1.5. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

One option to consider, if you want, is to branch digester into the sandbox and work on it that way. In case trying to treat it as an extension gets too painful. Hen On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Jochen, > first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences si

Re: [LANG] Suggestions For New Features

Thanks for posting. On the IO Active comment - it is something we need to figure out how to do better. I've a set of components I rotate between for example: IO, Lang, CLI, Codec, Collections amongst others. I know there are others who do the same kind of thing. But then we do have components t

Re: svn commit: r896590 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/reflect/ src/main/jav

All seems to be OK now, thanks. On 06/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: > thanks a lot, properties fixed with last commits > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:34 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: simonetripodi > >> Date: Wed Jan 6 18:10:44 2010 > >>

Re: svn commit: r896590 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/reflect/ src/main/jav

thanks a lot, properties fixed with last commits On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:34 PM, sebb wrote: > On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: simonetripodi >>  Date: Wed Jan  6 18:10:44 2010 >>  New Revision: 896590 >> >>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896590&view=rev >>  Log:

Re: svn commit: r896590 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/reflect/ src/main/jav

On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Wed Jan 6 18:10:44 2010 > New Revision: 896590 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=896590&view=rev > Log: > fixed Java eol-style property > [...] > Propchange: > commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/main/

Re: svn commit: r896453 - /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/DigesterRule.java

going to fix it too On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:57 PM, sebb wrote: > On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: simonetripodi >>  Date: Wed Jan  6 14:30:27 2010 >>  New Revision: 896453 > > [...] > >> >>  Propchange: >> commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/comm

Re: svn commit: r896449 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt README build.xml pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/resources/ src/test/ src/test/java/ src/test/r

Hi Sebb, sorry, something wrong in my svn client configuration, going to fix it Simo On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:56 PM, sebb wrote: > On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: simonetripodi >>  Date: Wed Jan  6 14:16:44 2010 >>  New Revision: 896449 >> >>  Propchange: commons/sandbo

Re: M2 SNAPSHOTS at repository.a.o WAS Re: FaltFile.jar @ us...@commons.a.o

On Jan 6, 2010, at 9:00 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Matt Benson wrote: On Jan 5, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Matt Benson wrote: FWIW, there is a [flatfile] M2 snapshot published at repository.apache.org. Which should be definitely not there! Only official reelases can go to

Re: svn commit: r896453 - /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/DigesterRule.java

On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Wed Jan 6 14:30:27 2010 > New Revision: 896453 [...] > > Propchange: > commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/digester/annotations/DigesterRule.java > > -

Re: svn commit: r896449 - in /commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk: LICENSE.txt NOTICE.txt README build.xml pom.xml src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/resources/ src/test/ src/test/java/ src/test/r

On 06/01/2010, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Wed Jan 6 14:16:44 2010 > New Revision: 896449 > > Propchange: commons/sandbox/at-digester/trunk/pom.xml > > -- > svn:eol-style = nat

Re: [LANG] Suggestions For New Features

Hey All, I know this is from a long time ago, but I finally created JIRA entries ( LANG-579 and LANG-580) for these features. I changed the inRange() methods to be inclusiveBetween() and exclusiveBetween

Re: M2 SNAPSHOTS at repository.a.o WAS Re: FaltFile.jar @ us...@commons.a.o

Matt Benson wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Matt Benson wrote: >> >>> FWIW, there is a [flatfile] M2 snapshot published at >>> repository.apache.org. >> >> Which should be definitely not there! Only official reelases can go to >> the >> repository. >> > > Does "

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

Hi Jochen, first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences since mine is an extension that uses annotations to build the Digester, I proposed the sandbox because is not complete, once terminated I'll propose to merge the sanbox code in the proper one. Have a nice day, best regards, Simo

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

What is the difference between this and the digester? Why is it a new project and can't it be integrated into the existing? On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys > As a new ASF committer, I'm setting up a new Commons Sandbox, called > "@Digester" > > @Digester > >

New sandbox component: at-digester

Hi all guys As a new ASF committer, I'm setting up a new Commons Sandbox, called "@Digester" @Digester The Apache commons-digester[1] is a great, light and fast XML parser; it works with the SAX APIs and provides a serie of facilities to map XML to POJOs. It's configurable in the following ways:

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

On 06/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: > >> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> > sebb wrote: > >> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used > Java 5. > >> > > > >> > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does

Re: [DBCP] Continuum Java 5 build - please?

sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: >> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> > sebb wrote: >> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java >> 5. >> > > >> > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 >> compatibility. >> > > >> > > I

Re: [DBCP] Possible bug in PerUserPoolDataSource

sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote: >> It looks like there may be a bug in PerUserPoolDataSource. >> >> From time to time, more than 10 of the threads acquire connections in >> the testMultipleThreads2() test case. I don't think this should >> happen, and it does not happen in the TestShar

Re: [JELLY] Branch to prepare for JEXL-2.0 enhancements?

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Henri, > > Some people might even say the whole of Jelly is dormant, and indeed, I, as > many other jelly committers have been unable to find cycles to simply fix > the most elementary things such as the wrong "how-to-start". > > Maven 2 is