That is fine with me.
I would not be shy about bumping the component version up by a major release to
mark the change, even if the component itself does not have 'major' changes
itself.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
> Sent: Thursd
Seems fine to me.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback so far. However, before taking concrete actions I
> would like to put the question again in a broader scope.
>
> The question is: Is it okay for a component to change its minimum required
> JDK from
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback so far. However, before taking concrete actions
> I would like to put the question again in a broader scope.
>
> The question is: Is it okay for a component to change its minimum
> required JDK from 1.3 to 1.4 in a minor release?
We are about to do th
Thanks for the feedback so far. However, before taking concrete actions
I would like to put the question again in a broader scope.
The question is: Is it okay for a component to change its minimum
required JDK from 1.3 to 1.4 in a minor release?
I just want to make sure that there are no veto
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> joe...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: joehni
>>> Date: Wed Dec 23 11:44:41 2009
>>> New Revision: 893481
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893481&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Drop XML artifacts used in test and explicit selection of
Phil Steitz wrote:
> joe...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: joehni
>> Date: Wed Dec 23 11:44:41 2009
>> New Revision: 893481
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893481&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Drop XML artifacts used in test and explicit selection of SAX driver.
>
> While the maven build in trunk
Hi Phil,
Phil Steitz wrote:
> joe...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: joehni
>> Date: Wed Dec 23 11:44:41 2009
>> New Revision: 893481
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893481&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Drop XML artifacts used in test and explicit selection of SAX driver.
>
> While the maven bui
joe...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: joehni
> Date: Wed Dec 23 11:44:41 2009
> New Revision: 893481
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893481&view=rev
> Log:
> Drop XML artifacts used in test and explicit selection of SAX driver.
While the maven build in trunk works only for JDK 1.6, the Ant
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release
>> candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for
>> release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only
>> difference between the two ve
10 matches
Mail list logo
