Accidental Facebook Spam

2009-12-23 Thread Doug Bateman
Dear Friend, Please accept my apologies for any emails you received regarding photo sharing in *Facebook*. As a rule I avoid sending undesired emails to anyone. Yet today, while using Facebook to locate old friends, a mouse mistake resulted in an email being sent to every person with whom I've s

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Phil Steitz wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> Hi Phil, >> >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >> [snip] >> I've modified the trunk and 1.3-branch now. In the 1.3 branch both JOCL tests set the SAX driver explicitly now and the used xerces artifact has been harmon

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2009-12-23 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=261476&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 23 Dec 2009 04:22:20 -0800 Finished at: Wed 23 Dec 2009 04:25:10 -0800 Total time: 2m 50s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> Jörg Schaible wrote: > > [snip] > >>> I've modified the trunk and 1.3-branch now. In the 1.3 branch both JOCL >>> tests set the SAX driver explicitly now and the used xerces artifact has >>> been harmonized between Ant and Maven build.

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: [snip] >> I've modified the trunk and 1.3-branch now. In the 1.3 branch both JOCL >> tests set the SAX driver explicitly now and the used xerces artifact has >> been harmonized between Ant and Maven build. Also the proper xml-apis is >> used no

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Steitz wrote: > >> I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release >> candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for >> release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only >> difference between the two ve

Cancelled: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Phil Steitz
This VOTE is cancelled due to showstoppers reported. Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2009-12-23 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=261435&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 23 Dec 2009 02:12:52 -0800 Finished at: Wed 23 Dec 2009 02:15:08 -0800 Total time: 2m 15s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

Re: [configuration] Minimum required JDK version

2009-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger wrote: > Currently the 1.x version of [configuration] requires JDK 1.3. I wonder > whether it makes sense to switch to JDK 1.4 instead. > > I used to think that a switch of the minimum JDK version was only > possible for a major release. However, JDK 1.3 reached its EOL so long > ago

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

2009-12-23 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote: > I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release > candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for > release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only > difference between the two versions is that the 1.3 sources we