+0, didn't made advanced test but sounds good
2009/12/21 Phil Steitz
> I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release
> candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for
> release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only
> difference between t
I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release
candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for
release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only
difference between the two versions is that the 1.3 sources were
filtered to exclude JDBC4 methods.
Not by me.
Ralph
On Dec 21, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Currently the 1.x version of [configuration] requires JDK 1.3. I wonder
> whether it makes sense to switch to JDK 1.4 instead.
>
> I used to think that a switch of the minimum JDK version was only possible
> for a major rel
Currently the 1.x version of [configuration] requires JDK 1.3. I wonder
whether it makes sense to switch to JDK 1.4 instead.
I used to think that a switch of the minimum JDK version was only
possible for a major release. However, JDK 1.3 reached its EOL so long
ago that this should not be an i
