Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-23 Thread Tommaso Teofili
I vote: >> [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it >> [ ] -1 No because... >> >> >> [X] +1 Use the Commons mailing lists >> [ ] -1 Bad idea because... >> >> Tommaso

Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: >> PoolingConnection$PStmtKey.PoolingConnection$PStmtKey._resultSetType >> could be null and is guaranteed to be dereferenced in >> org.apache.commons.dbcp.PoolingConnection.makeObject(Object) >> This looks like a bug; just check for null in the second condition? >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Niall Pemberton schrieb: [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it [ ] -1 No because... [X] +1 Use the Commons mailing lists [ ] -1 Bad idea because... Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional co

Re: Draft proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation incubator podling

2009-11-23 Thread Jeremy Bauer
Hi Donald, Excellent! I am interested in being an initial committer. -Jeremy (OpenJPA Committer and PMC Member) On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > We have an initial draft proposal to create a JSR-303 Bean Validation > implementation at Apache as an incubator podling. > >

[codec] regression in 1.4

2009-11-23 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Commons Developers, There's a minor regression in Codec-1.4 that causes two extra white space characters to appear at the very end of the Base64 output when using the instance encode() method instead of the static one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89 This seems to be causing

[DBCP] Noisy test output

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
The JUnit tests produce a lot of output, even if the tests are successful. Is there really any need to print stack traces in the following method? TestSharedPoolDataSource.PoolTest.run() I propose to comment them out. Similarly, the test case TestManual.testLogWriter() generates a lot of output

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it > [ ]  -1 No because... > > > In order to make it easier for commons to *observe* the incubation > effort does anyone object to discussion taking place on d...@commons > rather than a separate list and commits

Re: [dbcp] [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
On 22/11/2009, henrib wrote: > > Any other opinion ? > Sebb, Rahul, what's your take ? I've not used the JEXL API at all, except via BSF/JSR-223 (which have unchanged APIs). So I can't really comment on whether the JEXL API changes are likely to cause problems or not. Seems to me it would be

Re: [dbcp] [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-11-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:40 PM, henrib wrote: > > Any other opinion ? > Sebb, Rahul, what's your take ? I agree with your comments about compatibility for casual users. In effect, some Commons components (those we've sometimes characterized as ones with narrow deep APIs, such as JEXL) almost h

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Torsten Curdt
>>> Sure, but how many users have that requirement? More than 1%? >> >> Even if it is 1%, it's worth considering. I am really not comfortable >> with project addressing only the 80% more frequent cases. Minority >> should never be neglected. It's clearly a philosophical and personal choice. You ju

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Torsten Curdt a écrit : >>> We use some commons projects in one of our commercial products that >>> uses in-browser applets. Size is very important for some of our >>> customers who have clients connecting in from geographically remote >>> ou

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Torsten Curdt a écrit : >> We use some commons projects in one of our commercial products that >> uses in-browser applets. Size is very important for some of our >> customers who have clients connecting in from geographically remote >> outstations over links with about as much bandwidth as a piece

How often to release [Was: Consolidating Subprojects]

2009-11-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > As > Torsten pointed out, the difficulty managing "multi-releases" is > also not to be underestimated. IMO we do not do as good a job as we > should releasing often and early in Commons and I would be hesitant > to make a change that made that

Re: svn commit: r883394 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jocl/JOCLContentHandler.java

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
On 23/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > s...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: sebb > >> Date: Mon Nov 23 16:18:50 2009 > >> New Revision: 883394 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883394&view=rev > >> Log: > >> Boolean.valueOf() is better than new Boolean() >

Re: svn commit: r883394 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jocl/JOCLContentHandler.java

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > s...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: sebb >> Date: Mon Nov 23 16:18:50 2009 >> New Revision: 883394 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883394&view=rev >> Log: >> Boolean.valueOf() is better than new Boolean() > > Is this available in 1.4? I thought I checked and saw no.

Re: svn commit: r883394 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jocl/JOCLContentHandler.java

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
On 23/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: sebb > > Date: Mon Nov 23 16:18:50 2009 > > New Revision: 883394 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883394&view=rev > > Log: > > Boolean.valueOf() is better than new Boolean() > > Is this available in 1.4? I

Re: svn commit: r883394 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jocl/JOCLContentHandler.java

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
s...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Mon Nov 23 16:18:50 2009 > New Revision: 883394 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=883394&view=rev > Log: > Boolean.valueOf() is better than new Boolean() Is this available in 1.4? I thought I checked and saw no. Could be this one is and othe

Re: [DBCP] DelegatingDatabaseMetaData returns null for @NonNull methods

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Mark Thomas wrote: > sebb wrote: >> Findbugs has lots of complaints that the DelegatingDatabaseMetaData >> class methods may return null for methods which should be @NonNull. >> >> These are all of the form: >> >> public String getSchemaTerm() throws SQLException { >> { try { return _me

Re: [DBCP] DelegatingDatabaseMetaData returns null for @NonNull methods

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Thomas
sebb wrote: > Findbugs has lots of complaints that the DelegatingDatabaseMetaData > class methods may return null for methods which should be @NonNull. > > These are all of the form: > > public String getSchemaTerm() throws SQLException { > { try { return _meta.getSchemaTerm(); } >

[DBCP] DelegatingDatabaseMetaData returns null for @NonNull methods

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
Findbugs has lots of complaints that the DelegatingDatabaseMetaData class methods may return null for methods which should be @NonNull. These are all of the form: public String getSchemaTerm() throws SQLException { { try { return _meta.getSchemaTerm(); } catch (SQLException e)

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Doug Bateman wrote: > Howdy all, > > Tonight while browsing through the latest commons projects, it > occurred to me the once modest commons project has grown substantially > over time and has a lot of great stuff. There are now lots of sub > projects. Actually, it's 37 active subprojects to be

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
Niall Pemberton wrote: > > [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it > [ ] -1 No because... > ... > > [X] +1 Use the Commons mailing lists > [ ] -1 Bad idea because... > Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 23/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > On 22/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 22/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> >> I am running into some problems preparing for dbcp-1.3. I would >> >> >> appreciate comments / patches on any of th

Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 23/11/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Given that the Sun JDK's SSL implementation has the same problem as >> other SSL implementations, and given that Sun don't support the free >> 1.4 and 1.5 versions (so no security fixes coming), I think we do a >> disservice in even encouragi

Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
On 23/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 22/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 22/11/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> I am running into some problems preparing for dbcp-1.3. I would > >> >> appreciate comments / patches on any of the issues below. > >

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Torsten Curdt
> We use some commons projects in one of our commercial products that > uses in-browser applets. Size is very important for some of our > customers who have clients connecting in from geographically remote > outstations over links with about as much bandwidth as a piece of wet > string. > > We ship

Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread sebb
On 23/11/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > Given that the Sun JDK's SSL implementation has the same problem as > other SSL implementations, and given that Sun don't support the free > 1.4 and 1.5 versions (so no security fixes coming), I think we do a > disservice in even encouraging people to stay

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-11-23 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, really looking forward to that ... [X] +1 Yes lets sponsor it [ ] -1 No because... [X] +1 Use the Commons mailing lists [ ] -1 Bad idea because... Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Niall Pemberton wrote: > Donald Woods and I have put together a proposal for the incubator to > bring agima

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Mat Booth
2009/11/22 Doug Bateman : >> It means much bigger jars. 3M jars when people complain about the >> size of the 500k Collections jar. I think a lot of that is not the >> size of the jar, but the ability to grok the fullness of the API - >> anyone who actually cares about jar size should be using tool

Re: Consolidating Subprojects

2009-11-23 Thread Mat Booth
2009/11/22 Doug Bateman : >> It means much bigger jars. 3M jars when people complain about the >> size of the 500k Collections jar. I think a lot of that is not the >> size of the jar, but the ability to grok the fullness of the API - >> anyone who actually cares about jar size should be using tool

RE: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems

2009-11-23 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 21:17 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [dbcp] 1.3 release problems > > Given that the Sun JDK's SSL implementation has the same problem as > other SSL implementations, and g