sebb wrote:
> On 21/11/2009, pste...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: psteitz
>> Date: Sat Nov 21 20:04:53 2009
>> New Revision: 882981
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882981&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Made PoolingConnection pool CallableStatements.
>> JIRA: DBCP-204
>> Reported and patche
On 21/11/2009, pste...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Sat Nov 21 20:04:53 2009
> New Revision: 882981
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882981&view=rev
> Log:
> Made PoolingConnection pool CallableStatements.
> JIRA: DBCP-204
> Reported and patched by Wei Chen.
>
> Add
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:41 AM, Doug Bateman wrote:
> So that's the question... would it potentially be beneficial to
> consolidate some of the projects? What do we lose? What do we gain?
>
The developer community around many of the commons projects is small. Looking
at the committer lists can
Very impressive email.
With regards to JDK dependency, I would treat everything as 1.5
dependent and worry about how to handle 1.6/1,7. Lang's trunk is 1.5
and there are 3 issues that would like 1.6.
Some more/repeated issues:
* Ties release cycles together. Some major issue in one component
wou
On 21/11/2009, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sat Nov 21 08:08:52 2009
> New Revision: 882855
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882855&view=rev
> Log:
> Adding a char Range test
Also need tests for
Range.is(T, Comparator)
Range.between(T,T,Comparator)
> Modified
Howdy all,
Tonight while browsing through the latest commons projects, it
occurred to me the once modest commons project has grown substantially
over time and has a lot of great stuff. There are now lots of sub
projects. Actually, it's 37 active subprojects to be exact. Plus the
archived projec
