On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>
> Effectively, I think code on top of java.math is a fine fit for Lang,
> whereas Commons Math is a wholly different bigger beastie.
>
>> * System is missing IS_JAVA_1_7 constant
>
>
Niall Pemberton-2 wrote:
>
> ...
> I just tried generating JEXL site from trunk and it looks OK to me:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/jexl/
>
> Looking at your version, seems that site.css is different:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/jexl/2.0/RC2/site/css/site.css
>
> from m
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> * I think org.apache.commons.lang.math should be refactored and removed:
> * Fraction has nothing to do with this library and belongs in
> Commons Math. I see it so closely align to higher Math functions and
> not the JDK.
Dropping Fractio
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote at Samstag, 14. November 2009 10:32:
>
>> Wrapping 5 ArrayUtils issues up in one email to see if we can make
>> decisions on them.
>>
>> LANG-470 Add containsAll(Object[], Object[]) methods to ArrayUtils
>
This VOTE has passed with 1+ votes from
Niall Pemberton
Luc Maisonobe
Oiver Heger
Jim Jagielski
Phil Steitz
and -0 vote from Sebastian Bazley
Thanks!
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additi
I ran mvn site on my Mac and target/site/ looks just like what is at your link.
Did you upload it to p.a.o using site:deploy? BTW - the instructions say to
use mvn site-deploy. Where does that plugin come from? The standard maven
plugin is site:deploy.
Ralph
On Nov 16, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Niall
On 17/11/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Henrib wrote:
> >
> > I thought this might be related to the lack of commons-parent and/or
> > commons-build; even tried to ln -s those in the target as peers of
> checkout/
> > between prepare and perform to no avail.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Henrib wrote:
>
> I thought this might be related to the lack of commons-parent and/or
> commons-build; even tried to ln -s those in the target as peers of checkout/
> between prepare and perform to no avail.
> Did cut an RC2 that has the same site formatting / st
I thought this might be related to the lack of commons-parent and/or
commons-build; even tried to ln -s those in the target as peers of checkout/
between prepare and perform to no avail.
Did cut an RC2 that has the same site formatting / styling problem, it's
here: http://people.apache.org/builds/
Due to unsatisfactory site generation, the vote is cancelled.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-JEXL-2.0-based-on-RC1--CANCELLED--tp26379914p26379914.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote at Samstag, 14. November 2009 10:32:
> Wrapping 5 ArrayUtils issues up in one email to see if we can make
> decisions on them.
>
> LANG-470 Add containsAll(Object[], Object[]) methods to ArrayUtils
> LANG-531 Add defaultIfEmpty or nullIfEmpty to ArrayUtils
>
* I think org.apache.commons.lang.math should be refactored and removed:
* Fraction has nothing to do with this library and belongs in
Commons Math. I see it so closely align to higher Math functions and
not the JDK.
* IEEE754rUtils should move to the root package
* NumberUtils should move to
On 16/11/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
>
>
> sebb-2-2 wrote:
> >
> > IMO the whole point of tags is that they are supposed to be immutable.
> >
> > So if RC1 has to be redone, one continues with RC2, not a different RC1
> > tag.
> >
>
>
> The build step "D.2 React to the Vote" made me think it was
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "CreatingReleases" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Tags should not be reused.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases?action=diff&rev1=38
On 16/11/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
>
>
> > Tag looks mainly OK, contents agree with source archive apart from
> > doap and STATUS which are in SVN only. PROPOSAL file could probably be
> > dropped from source archive too.
> >
>
> Paraphrasing, doap and STATUS are not in the source archive; any poi
sebb-2-2 wrote:
>
> IMO the whole point of tags is that they are supposed to be immutable.
>
> So if RC1 has to be redone, one continues with RC2, not a different RC1
> tag.
>
The build step "D.2 React to the Vote" made me think it was Ok to refresh a
build.
Wont do it again. Plus that refre
Thanks for checking and sharing the info.
Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding). I successfully built it on my Mac. I also tested it
> with Commons Configuration and had no problems.
> Ralph
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-JEXL-2.0-based-on-RC1-tp26
> Tag looks mainly OK, contents agree with source archive apart from
> doap and STATUS which are in SVN only. PROPOSAL file could probably be
> dropped from source archive too.
>
Paraphrasing, doap and STATUS are not in the source archive; any pointers on
how do I add them ?
> Some of the CSS
Thanks for the comments.
> Looks like the commons skin is not applied to the above site -- its
> LnF should be similar to the site on c.a.o.
>
I've tried to address the issue and refreshed RC1 but the published site is
not the same as the one I get by generating locally through 'mvn site'.
I'm now able to publish releases but...
'mvn site' locally generates a different version than the one that ends up
being published; the local version does generate the reports menu & seems to
be styled correctly but the published version lacks the reports and styling
is non-existent...
Anyone with
IMO the whole point of tags is that they are supposed to be immutable.
So if RC1 has to be redone, one continues with RC2, not a different RC1 tag.
On 16/11/2009, hen...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: henrib
> Date: Mon Nov 16 14:30:28 2009
> New Revision: 880770
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> We have found and fixed another pool 1.5 regression (POOL-152) and
> we would like to cut a patch release including the fix.
>
> Release distributions:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.4-RC1/
>
> Maven artifacts:
> http://people.apac
22 matches
Mail list logo
