[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-11-04 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-11-04 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme contains errors. The current state of this projec

Re: [dbutils] binary compatibility

2009-11-04 Thread Dan Fabulich
Jörg Schaible wrote: Maybe you can use the src tarball from 1.2, change group and artifact id to something local, drop the Java source from main and add 1.3-SNAPSHOT as dependency. Then you should be able to run with this POM the tests of 1.2 with code base of 1.3. That test passes, though I d

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-11-04 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit contains errors. The current state of this proj

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-11-04 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Don

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Ni

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 27

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Do

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wr

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 2

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 on the proposal :) On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote:

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
I totally agree with that Donald :), but now its been weeks discussing the same subject and nothing changed. This is what I am talking about. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > Apache is built upon open collaboration within a community. > > Here, we have a significant code dona

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Hi Nail. I'm the one who created that copy of 1.4, so it'

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Donald Woods
Apache is built upon open collaboration within a community. Here, we have a significant code donation being offered, which would save us months or years in jump starting a JSR-303 implementation at Apache. Therefore, I believe the only fair approach is one that allows the code contributor com

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi... IMO, and sorry for saying that, now we've been transformed from thinking about the project on how to get Roman involved in code submission. IMO if this has no solution to be taken to get things up and running fast enough so either Ron accepts that situation, or we start doing it the way N

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-11-04 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>> Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > Hi Nail.  I'm the one who created that copy of 1.

Re: [dbutils] binary compatibility

2009-11-04 Thread Jörg Schaible
Dan Fabulich wrote at Dienstag, 3. November 2009 21:03: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Is it binary backward compatible? > > I think it is, but I'm not 100% certain; it's confusing. > > I ran clirr on dbutils-1.2 and my locally built 1.3-SNAPSHOT; it found one > clear compatibility error which I j