Thanks for the review!
2009/11/4 Dan Fabulich :
> Julien Aymé wrote:
>
>> I've submitted a patch for DBUTILS-54 and DBUTILS-57, which can be
>> added to the release if someone (Dan? ;-) ) has the time to review
>> them.
>>
>> I'll try to submit a patch for DBUTILS-50 later this evening, but I
>> t
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=249171&projectId=162
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 3 Nov 2009 11:36:17 -0800
Finished at: Tue 3 Nov 2009 11:36:56 -0800
Total time: 39s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
Kudos indeed. Nice work!
Phil
l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: luc
> Date: Tue Nov 3 22:04:08 2009
> New Revision: 832577
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=832577&view=rev
> Log:
> fixed an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
> Kudos to Dimitri who debugged this mess of fortran/java array in
Julien Aymé wrote:
I've submitted a patch for DBUTILS-54 and DBUTILS-57, which can be
added to the release if someone (Dan? ;-) ) has the time to review
them.
I'll try to submit a patch for DBUTILS-50 later this evening, but I
think this will require a little more time and thoughts.
https://is
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Is it binary backward compatible?
I think it is, but I'm not 100% certain; it's confusing.
I ran clirr on dbutils-1.2 and my locally built 1.3-SNAPSHOT; it found one
clear compatibility error which I just fixed (DBUTILS-61). This is what
it says as of r832529:
INFO:
Dan Fabulich wrote at Dienstag, 3. November 2009 02:57:
>
> In r832220 I merged the sandbox/dbutils/java5 branch to
> proper/dbutils/trunk. The build works and has no compiler warnings.
Is it binary backward compatible?
- Jörg
-
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
>> 2009/11/3 Luc Maisonobe :
>>> There are at least one other regular commiter and three other committers
>>> that have been active on the list last year. Phil is clearly one of the
>>> most involved maintainers and he has been here since the beginn
Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2009/11/3 Luc Maisonobe :
>> There are at least one other regular commiter and three other committers
>> that have been active on the list last year. Phil is clearly one of the
>> most involved maintainers and he has been here since the beginning.
> Okay, thanks for t
I've submitted a patch for DBUTILS-54 and DBUTILS-57, which can be
added to the release if someone (Dan? ;-) ) has the time to review
them.
I'll try to submit a patch for DBUTILS-50 later this evening, but I
think this will require a little more time and thoughts.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/b
