Is that a completely unchangeable opinion?
Would you be willing to live with data generation in the distribution
classes even if you don't particularly like it?
Would user opinions sway your opinion if we had some way of collecting them?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> Phil,
>
> What do you think about the proposal at
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-310 in regards to our
> discussion on the topic?
As I said above, I am not in favor of adding random data generation
to the distributions package.
Phil
>
> Cheers, Mikkel
+1
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-email-1.2 based on RC3.
>>
>
>>
>> [X] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [ ] -1 no, do not r
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-email-1.2 based on RC3.
>
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because
-Rahul
--
sharath wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>Say I'm having following beans
>
> public class Employee
> {
> private String emp_name;
> private String emp_no;
> private Timestamp emp_doj;
>
>
> public String getEmp_name() {
> return emp_name;
empdeptDetails.putAll(BeanUtils.describe(emp));
empdeptDetails.putAll(BeanUtils.describe(dept));
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:59 PM, sharath wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Say I'm having following beans
>
> public class Employee
> {
> private String emp_name;
> private String emp_no
Hi All,
Say I'm having following beans
public class Employee
{
private String emp_name;
private String emp_no;
private Timestamp emp_doj;
public String getEmp_name() {
return emp_name;
}
public void setEmp_name(
