Lang release date

2009-10-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Just an FYI that I've set a target date of April 1st 2010 in for Lang 3.0. This is the one I have in my head - it marks 2 years since the 2.4 release which feels like the right length of time between releases when the next release is going to be a major one and having it in JIRA allows me to see a

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > So I would like to propose the following direction for a Validator2 > based on the Bean Validation Framework(JSR 303) - a project with three > separate modules composing of: > >  - The Bean Validation (JSR303) API - no dependencies >  -

[all] Problems running "mvn site" - anyone else seeing this?

2009-10-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
I'm hitting the following problem trying to build the site for a couple of components: http://maven.markmail.org/message/nwrpf3ym4wanajyq Tony's solution works for me (adding the commons lang dependency to the site plugin in the parent pom) - just wondered if anyone else is seeing this (could be

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Matt Benson
+1 --- On Fri, 10/23/09, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din > Subject: Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR > 303 > To: "Commons Developers List" > Date: Friday, October 23, 2009, 4:35 AM > +1 > > Actually this is even better to start from

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Paul Benedict
Doesn't Commons Validator currently include JavaScript routines? I think that's value that shouldn't be thrown away regardless of JSR-303 implementation. Paul On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Niall, > thanks for your reply, that's my > > +1 > > :) I'm not an Apache Com

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Niall, thanks for your reply, that's my +1 :) I'm not an Apache Committer but I already contributed to Cocoon3 and just submitted my first patch to commons-digester, so I'm quite familiar to how things work here. Sure, I'll follow the list and take me in consideration!! All the best, Simone

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-10-23 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 Actually this is even better to start from scratch. I am in Niall. On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me > > Anyone can vote - it ma

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi guys, > I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me Anyone can vote - it may end up we don't agree - but votes are appreciated. > say that sounds great, commons-validation has to be the proper home > for JSR303,

Re: [validator] Direction of validator implementation based on JSR 303

2009-10-23 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi guys, I don't have the rights to express votes but at least please let me say that sounds great, commons-validation has to be the proper home for JSR303, I'd like to contribute in this project since I already started studying the spec :) All the best, Simone On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:58 AM, He