Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 12

2009-10-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release version 12 of the commons-parent pom - the changes > since the last release are: > > > [X] +1 > [ ] =0 > [ ] -1 -Rahul - To unsubscribe, e-m

[VOTE] Release commons-parent 12

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi, I'd like to release version 12 of the commons-parent pom - the changes since the last release are: - the javadoc jar now has standard entries (e.g. version, title) added to its MANIFEST.MF file - the sources jar now has standard entries (e.g. version, title) added to its MANIFEST.MF file -

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC2

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> I have prepared a second release candidate for BeanUtils 1.8.1. The >> main change since RC1 was to add a note about the memory leak not >> being fixed on IBM JDK 1.6 to the relea

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC2

2009-10-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared a second release candidate for BeanUtils 1.8.1. The > main change since RC1 was to add a note about the memory leak not > being fixed on IBM JDK 1.6 to the release notes, but there were a > couple of other minor tweaks to th

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.1 based on RC5

2009-10-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > after many failures (and a lot of help) I have now the RC for > commons-exec ready - the focus is to get a patch for the Exec Maven > Plugin out of the door ... :-) > > > [X] +1 release it > [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care > [

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC2

2009-10-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared a second release candidate for BeanUtils 1.8.1. The > main change since RC1 was to add a note about the memory leak not > being fixed on IBM JDK 1.6 to the release notes, but there were a > couple of other minor tweaks to the site. > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons BeanUtils -

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
This failed because the test ran out of memory - see http://tinyurl.com/yhdzhdp Niall On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:33 PM, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org wrote: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=237425&projectId=156 > > Build statistics: >  State: Fail

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons BeanUtils -

2009-10-16 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=237425&projectId=156 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Fri 16 Oct 2009 13:28:41 -0700 Finished at: Fri 16 Oct 2009 13:32:55 -0700 Total time: 4m 13s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

[VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC2

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have prepared a second release candidate for BeanUtils 1.8.1. The main change since RC1 was to add a note about the memory leak not being fixed on IBM JDK 1.6 to the release notes, but there were a couple of other minor tweaks to the site. [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC2 [ ] -1 No, b

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

2009-10-16 Thread Ted Dunning
The deprecation should be a pretty significant warning. Adding javadoc to RealVector to point people over at the AbstractRealVector with a recommendation that they not implement all the methods would help reinforce that message. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > what I ha

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote at Montag, 12. Oktober 2009 23:33: > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> Are these issues release blockers? >>> >>> I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise >>

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.1 based on RC5

2009-10-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine on Windows with JDK 1.6 and 1.4. Artifacts look good. No problems, so +1. Only minor nit: A RELEASE-NOTES.txt (which is typical for most commons components) is missing. But I guess the information is available in the changes report. Oliver Siegfried Goeschl schrieb: Hi fol

Re: [math] Questions about the linear package

2009-10-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Jake Mannix a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Bill Barker wrote: > >> I'm +1 on this (including being willing to help). Like Luc, I don't >> believe that there are very many people implementing custom versons of these >> interfaces. >> > > Ok great, I feel a consensus building here, s

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.0.1 based on RC5

2009-10-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Siegfried Goeschl a écrit : > Hi folks, > > after many failures (and a lot of help) I have now the RC for > commons-exec ready - the focus is to get a patch for the Exec Maven > Plugin out of the door ... :-) > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/EXEC_1_0_1_RC5/