Niall Pemberton wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:03:
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Thanks for testing, comments inline...
>
[snip]
>>
>> Issues with Sun JDK 1.3.1:
>> ==
>>
>> Source compilable, but a lot of tests fail.
>
> All the tests pass for me - I was using Ant 1.7.1 and Su
sebb wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:13:
> On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem
>> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs.
>> Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder
On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:09 PM, Eduardo Segura wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using the webdav client to connect to a sharepoint server. I see
that in:
org.apache.commons.vfs.provider.http.HttpClientFactory
createConnection(...)
is using only UsernamePasswordCredentials. I've modified this code to
al
Hi there,
I'm using the webdav client to connect to a sharepoint server. I see that in:
org.apache.commons.vfs.provider.http.HttpClientFactory createConnection(...)
is using only UsernamePasswordCredentials. I've modified this code to
also use NTCredentials
(for my own custom build). I was wonde
On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >
> > <...>
> >
> >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem
> >> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDK
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> <...>
>
>> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem
>> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs.
>> Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder if
On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
<...>
> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem
> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs.
> Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder if they work with IBM
> JDK and ant, rather than maven1)
Hi Jörg,
Thanks for testing, comments inline...
Niall
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Niall,
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a
>> year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1
>>
>> [ ] +1 Yes go ahea
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a
> year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> BeanUtils 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here:
> http://pe
We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a
year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
BeanUtils 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.1-rc1/
Detai
On Oct 8, 2009, at 3:53 AM, sebb wrote:
I'm in the process of adding JUnit4 to JMeter, and the jar works fine
with JUnit3 tests.
However, JUnit4 requires Java 1.5+ which I assume is OK?
Yes. configuration2 is specifically for 1.5+.
Ralph
-
On 08/10/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>
> > I would like to switch to JUnit 4.x in the configuration2 branch.
> >
> > While I think it does not make a big difference, I use it in my day job
> and have grown comfortable with some of the features.
Hi Rahul,
thanks a lot, as you maybe already noticed, the JIRA issue was just created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIGESTER-135
I'm available for any kind of question.
Best regards!!!
Simone
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Simone
13 matches
Mail list logo
