Re: [all] Unable to deploy to people.apache.org due to "Algorithm negotiation fail"

2009-09-28 Thread Phil Steitz
Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > I got my next problem - when I run "mvn -Prc release:perform" I get > > "Error deploying artifact: Authentication failed: Cannot connect. > Reason: Algorithm negotiation fail" > > Having said that > > +) I'm using Maven 2.0.10 on Mac OS X 10.4 > +) I can

Re: [all] M2 release plugin fails with SVN error ...

2009-09-28 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi Dennis, +) I downgraded to SVN 1.5.0 but still got an SVN error (the SVN sync issue) +) re-running the maven release plugin did the trick (before I hit the next problem) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I have simply no "comm

[all] Unable to deploy to people.apache.org due to "Algorithm negotiation fail"

2009-09-28 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, I got my next problem - when I run "mvn -Prc release:perform" I get "Error deploying artifact: Authentication failed: Cannot connect. Reason: Algorithm negotiation fail" Having said that +) I'm using Maven 2.0.10 on Mac OS X 10.4 +) I can ssh to people.apache.org +) I can scp to peopl

Re: svn commit: r819141 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/LazyInitializer.java test/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/ test/org/apache/commons/lang/concur

2009-09-28 Thread Oliver Heger
sebb schrieb: On 28/09/2009, sebb wrote: On 28/09/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > sebb wrote: > > > Where is that described? The first reference I found says that the > > local variable is a performance optimisation; it's the volatile > > keyword that makes it thread-safe: > > > > >

Re: svn commit: r819141 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/LazyInitializer.java test/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/ test/org/apache/commons/lang/concur

2009-09-28 Thread sebb
On 28/09/2009, sebb wrote: > On 28/09/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > sebb wrote: > > > > > Where is that described? The first reference I found says that the > > > local variable is a performance optimisation; it's the volatile > > > keyword that makes it thread-safe: > > > > > > > >

Re: Why not add the readFully method to IOUtils?

2009-09-28 Thread sebb
On 27/09/2009, James King wrote: > Hi All, > Currently, there is no readFully method in IOUtils, the method that is > the same as the normal read(b, off, len) in java.io.InputStream, but > tries to ensure that the entire len number of bytes are read. > > There is a readFully method in java.io.

Why not add the readFully method to IOUtils?

2009-09-28 Thread James King
Hi All, Currently, there is no readFully method in IOUtils, the method that is the same as the normal read(b, off, len) in java.io.InputStream, but tries to ensure that the entire len number of bytes are read. There is a readFully method in java.io.DataInput. However, this method will throw EOFExc

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-09-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-09-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme contains errors. The current state of this projec

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

2009-09-28 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit contains errors. The current state of this proj

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-28 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: svn commit: r819141 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/LazyInitializer.java test/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/ test/org/apache/commons/lang/concur

2009-09-28 Thread sebb
On 28/09/2009, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > sebb wrote: > > > Where is that described? The first reference I found says that the > > local variable is a performance optimisation; it's the volatile > > keyword that makes it thread-safe: > > > > > http://technology.amis.nl/blog/4384/the-double-checke

Re: svn commit: r819141 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/LazyInitializer.java test/org/apache/commons/lang/concurrent/ test/org/apache/commons/lang/concur

2009-09-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
sebb wrote: Where is that described? The first reference I found says that the local variable is a performance optimisation; it's the volatile keyword that makes it thread-safe: http://technology.amis.nl/blog/4384/the-double-checked-locking-confusion also http://jeremymanson.blogspot.com/2008/05