Thought I'd share the status of Lang 3.0.
* 65 resolved issues out of 131. Basically around 50% of the way there.
* 65 contributors involved, with 55 patches and 340 comments. Thanks
to everyone out there for the work so far.
* First commit on 25 Mar 2008, so about 18 months along now. That was
on
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Oliver
Heger wrote:
> Phil Steitz schrieb:
>>
>> Oliver Heger wrote:
>>>
>>> AIUI the mission of commons-lang is to provide extensions and
>>> improvements for existing Java API classes. The concurrent package in
>>> Java 5 is a great step forward in supporting multi
Phil Steitz schrieb:
Oliver Heger wrote:
AIUI the mission of commons-lang is to provide extensions and
improvements for existing Java API classes. The concurrent package in
Java 5 is a great step forward in supporting multi-threaded programming
in Java, nevertheless there is certainly still room
On 06/09/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 05/09/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> >> Phil Steitz a écrit :
> >>
> >>> sebb wrote:
> >> >> There are quite a lot of assertions that don't give any details if a
> test fails.
> >> >>
> >> >> For example, the following currently fail
Hi Phil...
Do you suggest to start a commons-concurrent as a commons sandbox project ?
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Oliver Heger wrote:
>> AIUI the mission of commons-lang is to provide extensions and
>> improvements for existing Java API classes. The concurrent packag
sebb wrote:
> On 05/09/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>
>>> sebb wrote:
>> >> There are quite a lot of assertions that don't give any details if a
>> test fails.
>> >>
>> >> For example, the following currently fails when using Harmony:
>> >>
>> >>
>> testIncreasingTol
Oliver Heger wrote:
> AIUI the mission of commons-lang is to provide extensions and
> improvements for existing Java API classes. The concurrent package in
> Java 5 is a great step forward in supporting multi-threaded programming
> in Java, nevertheless there is certainly still room for improvement
On 05/09/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
> > sebb wrote:
> >> There are quite a lot of assertions that don't give any details if a test
> fails.
> >>
> >> For example, the following currently fails when using Harmony:
> >>
> >>
> testIncreasingTolerance(org.apache.commo
I agree with regarding the point that we should extend and enhance
what we already have, either in standard Java API(s) or what is
already provided in other frameworks. For the class that you proposed,
we can consider it like a utility class that is going to be provided
instead of re-writing it.
O
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating
a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean
Validation spec [2] and [3]. Since JSR-303 is now a required component
AIUI the mission of commons-lang is to provide extensions and
improvements for existing Java API classes. The concurrent package in
Java 5 is a great step forward in supporting multi-threaded programming
in Java, nevertheless there is certainly still room for improvements.
The proposed concurre
11 matches
Mail list logo