[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-02 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-lang3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [CLI] Simple usage message

2009-09-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Michael Heuer wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage message they also get a s

Re: [CLI] Simple usage message

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Heuer
Jim Jagielski wrote: > There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people > to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of > course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage > message they also get a superfluous "Missing required" note as well...

[JEXL] 2.x as trunk

2009-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Since the primary focus for the past few months has been the 2.0 / 2.x branch, I suggest we change it to trunk and move the trunk to the 1.x branch. OK? I'm planning on doing this in ~48 hours or sooner if enough folks agree. -Rahul ---

Re: [JEXL] / operator behavior change

2009-09-02 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:08 PM, sebb wrote: > On 02/09/2009, Henrib wrote: >> >>  As part of JEXL-87 (which relates to JEXL-65), the / operator now does >>  integer divisions on integers (big or small); in other words, it behaves the >>  same way the other operators do. >> >>  This is the common

[CLI] Simple usage message

2009-09-02 Thread Jim Jagielski
There are times when add in -h/--help and want to allow people to just go ahead and call the app with that option. The rub is, of course, if there are any required options, in addition to the usage message they also get a superfluous "Missing required" note as well... This is, imo at least, ugly.

Re: svn commit: r810445 - in /commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/parser/ test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/

2009-09-02 Thread sebb
On 02/09/2009, Henrib wrote: > > > > sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > > > > Seems like a complicated way of fixing the problem; I would have > > thought it was simpler to ensure that multiple statements are > > separated by ";" instead. > > > > i.e. a script consists of > > > > Statement ( ";" Stat

Re: [JEXL] / operator behavior change

2009-09-02 Thread sebb
On 02/09/2009, Henrib wrote: > > As part of JEXL-87 (which relates to JEXL-65), the / operator now does > integer divisions on integers (big or small); in other words, it behaves the > same way the other operators do. > > This is the common behavior in several languages (Java, ECMAScript, C, C

[JEXL] / operator behavior change

2009-09-02 Thread Henrib
As part of JEXL-87 (which relates to JEXL-65), the / operator now does integer divisions on integers (big or small); in other words, it behaves the same way the other operators do. This is the common behavior in several languages (Java, ECMAScript, C, C++) and the workaround if you need decimal p

Re: svn commit: r810445 - in /commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/parser/ test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/

2009-09-02 Thread Henrib
sebb-2-2 wrote: > > > Seems like a complicated way of fixing the problem; I would have > thought it was simpler to ensure that multiple statements are > separated by ";" instead. > > i.e. a script consists of > > Statement ( ";" Statement )* > > So long as "Statement" includes a null statem

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-09-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-09-02 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-09-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: svn commit: r810445 - in /commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/ main/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/parser/ test/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/

2009-09-02 Thread sebb
On 02/09/2009, hen...@apache.org wrote: > Author: henrib > Date: Wed Sep 2 10:23:03 2009 > New Revision: 810445 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=810445&view=rev > Log: > JEXL-90: fix in Parser, enforce 2 expressions are separated by a semi-colon > (';') in StatementExpression. > >

Re: [dbutils] Consider moving Mock classes from src/test to src/java

2009-09-02 Thread Julien Aymé
2009/9/2 Jochen Wiedmann : > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Julien Aymé wrote: > >> Does this change the way the distrib is build, and/or alter the maven >> scripts? > > You need to add the jar:test-jar goal, as outlined on the link I > posted previously. > > Jochen > Thanks a lot Jochen and Dan

Re: [dbutils] Consider moving Mock classes from src/test to src/java

2009-09-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Julien Aymé wrote: > Does this change the way the distrib is build, and/or alter the maven scripts? You need to add the jar:test-jar goal, as outlined on the link I posted previously. Jochen -- Perl rules: http://xkcd.com/224/ -