2009/9/2 Jochen Wiedmann :
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
>> Filing a JIRA issue wouldn't hurt, but I'm not sure we'd want to ship our
>> mocks as part of the product. I think there are better implementations of
>> MockResultSet out there (SQLUnit, Mockrunner, etc.)
>
> W
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Filing a JIRA issue wouldn't hurt, but I'm not sure we'd want to ship our
> mocks as part of the product. I think there are better implementations of
> MockResultSet out there (SQLUnit, Mockrunner, etc.)
Why not simply publish the test jar?
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
Julien Aymé wrote:
What do you think? Should I create a JIRA issue for this?
Filing a JIRA issue wouldn't hurt, but I'm not sure we'd want to ship our
mocks as part of the product. I think there are better implementations of
MockResultSet out there (SQLUnit, Mockrunner, etc.)
-Dan
--
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On 01/09/2009, Chen Bangzhong wrote:
> Hi, experts
>
> I have one java web application. In the application, several datasource was
> configured for dbcp. For each datasource, maxActive was set to 100 and max
> Idle set to 30.
This is a question for the Commons User list.
See: http://commons.a
Hi, experts
I have one java web application. In the application, several datasource was
configured for dbcp. For each datasource, maxActive was set to 100 and max Idle
set to 30.
Then I used several crawlers to make the web application very busy, until the
application reported that it can't ge
On 01/09/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
> Correction, the behavior has *not* changed in the current trunk.
> An expression with multiple statements still logs a warning upon creation
> and only executes its first child.
> Checked with:
>
> public void testSebb() throws Exception {
> JexlContex
Correction, the behavior has *not* changed in the current trunk.
An expression with multiple statements still logs a warning upon creation
and only executes its first child.
Checked with:
public void testSebb() throws Exception {
JexlContext ctxt = JexlHelper.createContext();
Jexl
The latest set of SVN updates have changed the behaviour of JEXL 2.0
expressions containing multiple statements, e.g. "1;2;3;"
Previously, the whole script was parsed, but only the first statement
in the expression was evaluated, and a warning message was logged:
WARNING: The JEXL Expression crea
11 matches
Mail list logo
