Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version

2009-08-21 Thread James Carman
Well, if you're going to make a jump, why go to something that's EOSL very soon? On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] >> On Behalf Of James Carman >> Sent: Friday, August 21,

RE: [VFS] Minimum Java version

2009-08-21 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] > On Behalf Of James Carman > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:23 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, wrote: > > In f

Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version

2009-08-21 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, wrote: > In favour of 1.5 as minimum. > Older JDKs are EOL - and java5 came with a lot of enhancements. > JDK5 is very close to EOSL! http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/index_jdk5.jsp - To un

Re: [VFS] Minimum Java version

2009-08-21 Thread david
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Ralph Goers wrote: Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the community however before this change is made. So pl

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-08-21 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Henri Yandell schrieb: +1 to remove. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:32 AM, sebb wrote: LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it turns out that the Sun Java 1.5

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-08-21 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-08-21 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-08-21 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati