To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
Hi Ralph,
+1 on Java 5.
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 16:34:
> The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely
> have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package
> renaming right now.
>
> The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't c
Hi Jukka,
Jukka Zitting wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 14:37:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> The only concern I have are the new Broken(In/Out)putStream
>> implementations. IMHO those are somewhat out-of-scope for IO, you
>> explicitly mention that thes
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=207479&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 19 Aug 2009 16:04:03 -0700
Finished at: Wed 19 Aug 2009 16:09:13 -0700
Total time: 5m 9s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
What version of Java will IO 2.0 be targeting? As I understand it, the next
version will target Java 5 compatibility, in which case the file monitoring
functionality may be beneficial to users who will not be transitioning to
Java 7 soon. I personally think this would be great functionality and wou
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19/08/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jukka Zitting
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>> >> The only concern I have are the new Broken(In/Out)putStream
>>
On 19/08/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
> >> The only concern I have are the new Broken(In/Out)putStream
> implementations.
> >> IMHO those are somewhat out-of-scop
Hi!
+1 on Java 5.
> Are they going to change the package name?
Let's discuss this once we cross this bridge.
Ciao,
Mario
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@co
+1 for Java 5.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:18 AM
> To: Commons Developers List; Commons Users List
> Subject: [VFS] Minimum Java version
>
> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4.
In JDK 1.7 the new NIO2 changes include a new "Watch Service" which is
hooked into the underlying operating system's events (where possible):
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/io/notification.html
I added some File Listener/Monitor stuff added a year or so ago, but
it hasn't yet b
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> The only concern I have are the new Broken(In/Out)putStream implementations.
>> IMHO those are somewhat out-of-scope for IO, you explicitly mention that
>> these implementations
On Aug 19, 2009, at 7:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from
the community however before this change is
The packages haven't been changed so far. But this would definitely
have to be considered whether we would want to take on the package
renaming right now.
The minimum JDK for 1.0 was 1.3, although it isn't clear that that was
correct. The minimum JDK for 2.0 has already been changed to 1.4
Are they going to change the package name?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has not been
> released and the developers are considering making the minimum version JDK
> 5. We are interested in getting feedback fro
Currently the minimum Java version for VFS 2.0 is 1.4. VFS 2.0 has
not been released and the developers are considering making the
minimum version JDK 5. We are interested in getting feedback from the
community however before this change is made. So please respond with
your thoughts on th
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> The only concern I have are the new Broken(In/Out)putStream implementations.
> IMHO those are somewhat out-of-scope for IO, you explicitly mention that
> these implementations are for testing purposes. I'd rather see commons-test
> react
Ralph Goers wrote at Montag, 17. August 2009 01:44:
>
> On Aug 16, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>>
>> I have not dealt with the delimiter stuff yet, but am +1 for
>> removing the attribute splitting. The splitting of values should be
>> disabled per default IMHO, too.
>>
>
> Actually
Hi Jukka,
Jukka Zitting wrote at Montag, 17. August 2009 23:55:
> Hi,
>
> There's quite a lot of good new stuff in the Commons IO trunk and I'd
> like to start slowly (timescale: months) pushing towards the 2.0
> release. Please make sure that any issues you want to see resolved
> before the rel
Hi!
> System.err.println(".");
> System.gc();
> Thread.sleep(1000);
>
> SoftReferences are triggered by low memory, but not by number of gc
> calls.
> AFAICS this simply slows down the tests tremendously, but have no real
> effect.
Hmmm during my tests, I have seen ja
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 09:16:
>
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 00:54:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>
Hi Mario,
Mario Ivankovits wrot
On Aug 19, 2009, at 12:11 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Guys,
I'd like to apply the following change:
=== %<
Index: core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/AbstractVfsTestCase.java
===
--- core/src/test/java
On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote at Mittwoch, 19. August 2009 00:54:
On Aug 18, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Mario,
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
I wont say that there aren't other ways to solve that, but using
simple
inheritance an
Guys,
I'd like to apply the following change:
=== %<
Index: core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/AbstractVfsTestCase.java
===
--- core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/AbstractVfsTestCase.java
(revi
25 matches
Mail list logo
