On Aug 13, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Ralph,
is this transparent for a UserAuthenticator ?
I don't believe it applies to UserAuthenticators at all. When a
userid and password are placed in a url the url eventually gets parsed
to create a FileName. During the creation of th
Ralph,
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht (Anfang)
Betreff: svn commit: r804052 - /commons/proper/vfs/trunk/xdocs/filesystems.xml
Absender: rgoers-1odqgaof3lkdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org
Datum: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:53:32 +0200
Newsgruppe: gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.scm
Author: rgoers
Date:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=206014&projectId=178
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Building
Started at: Thu 13 Aug 2009 14:32:15 -0700
Finished at: Thu 13 Aug 2009 14:34:28 -0700
Total time: 2m 12s
Build Trigger: Schedule
On 13/08/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Henrib wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >>
> >> Not really a direction per se:
> >> * We've had some syntactic additions, but its been organic growth
> >> * We do have a JSR-223 engine for convenience, I
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Henrib wrote:
>
>
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>
>> Not really a direction per se:
>> * We've had some syntactic additions, but its been organic growth
>> * We do have a JSR-223 engine for convenience, I think we shouldn't
>> go too far with it (no jexl.conf à la JEXL
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz
wrote:
> We do not have an ETA, but we are close. Watch this list for release
> plans, RCs, etc.
>
> Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code in
> trunk would be most appreciated.
We are not using any "advanced featu
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
>> We do not have an ETA, but we are close.
>> Watch this list for release plans, RCs, etc.
>> Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code
>> in trunk would be most appreciated.
>
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:24:38 -0400, Phil Steitz
wrote:
> We do not have an ETA, but we are close.
> Watch this list for release plans, RCs, etc.
> Reports on any issues that you may have observed running the code
> in trunk would be most appreciated.
We are not using any "advanced features"
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
Thanks for being crystal clear. :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-JEXL--functional-directions-tp24937743p24953662.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscri
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> I say we keep it simple ...
>
Fine with me.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> Using that comparison, the place where JEXL excelled was to fill the
> gap that JSP EL had in terms of assignments, method invocations and a
> generally more seamless bridging to Java objects in t
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Hi,
I'm member of Linux Debian Java packaging team.
We are currently slowly graduating to OpenJDK-6 as default JVM and Commons
DBCP 1.2.X doesn't currently build with its JDBC4 API.
I know that current trunk (1.3.X ?) build and run fine as I'm using it at
work
for
Hi,
over in Ant land we've received a bug report that Ant's ftp task
wouldn't compile against commons-net 2,0 because the IMAGE_FILE_TYPE
constant was removed from the FTP class.
Given that trunk still has that constant, is trunk in net sort of
obsolete and we should consider one of the branches
Hi Mario,
coming back to this now again ... ;-)
Mario Ivankovits wrote at Donnerstag, 6. August 2009 17:36:
> Hi!
>
> Using weak ref as default seems not too bad. However, since the file
> objects have just their parent cached it might lead to much more file
> system access then now as a parent
Hi,
I'm member of Linux Debian Java packaging team.
We are currently slowly graduating to OpenJDK-6 as default JVM and Commons
DBCP 1.2.X doesn't currently build with its JDBC4 API.
I know that current trunk (1.3.X ?) build and run fine as I'm using it at
work
for load testing but I want to kn
17 matches
Mail list logo
