Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC4

On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Julius Davies wrote: > I'm +1 too! > > I'm not a committer, but this +1 vote from me conveys my intention to > watch the mailing list for any problems, issues, ideas related to > codec-1.4 for at least the next... umm year? Thanks for this and you help with cod

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC4

I'm +1 too! I'm not a committer, but this +1 vote from me conveys my intention to watch the mailing list for any problems, issues, ideas related to codec-1.4 for at least the next... umm year? (Sorry about delay on my vote... just hadn't found a moment to play around with the RC4 artifacts ye

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC4

This vote has passed with four +1 votes (an d no other) from the following people: Gary Gregory Niall Pemberton Luc Maisonobe Phil Steitz Niall On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared a fourth release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the > feedback from the thir

[LANG] Suggestions For New Features

These are several additions that I feel might be useful to the Commons Lang Project. Please feel free to provide feedback, and if there is enough interest in any of them I will create JIRA entries, code them, and provide patches. Expand Validate to include more specific, human readable validation

Re: [ALL] Bulk closing issues on release [was: Release math 2.0 (take two)]

On 09/08/2009, Phil Steitz wrote: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Rahul > Akolkar > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:09 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit : > > > > > > > >

Re: [codec] Are we ready for Codec 1.4 RC4?

On 06/08/2009, Gary Gregory wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 8:55 AM > > To: Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [codec] Are we ready for Codec 1.4 RC4? > > > > On 06/08/2009, Gary Gregory wrote: > > >

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

Re: [ALL] Bulk closing issues on release [was: Release math 2.0 (take two)]

Jörg Schaible wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:09 AM, wrote: - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit : Hi Phil, why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead of closed now?

Re: [ALL] Bulk closing issues on release [was: Release math 2.0 (take two)]

Henri Yandell wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:09 AM, wrote: >>> >>> - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit : >>> Hi Phil, why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead of closed now? >>> >>> I forgot t

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati