- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:55 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 2.0
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/as
I've finished the implementation of a basic Jexl ScriptEngine for JSR-223.
Several items remain to be resolved:
The current implementation only has direct access to the ENGINE_SCOPE bindings.
If we wish to give direct access to GLOBAL_SCOPE, how should this be managed?
Perhaps use a name prefix
On 30/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 30/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
> >> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > [snip]
> >> >> I have to step out in a minute or two (I can
The release distributions are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC3/
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC3
Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours (01:00 GMT 2-Aug-09)
Thanks!
Phil
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:39 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >
>> > [snip]
>> >> I have to step out in a minute or two (I can try later), but what I'd
>> >> try is to make the complete
sebb-2-2 wrote:
>
> The code I'm working on currently uses JexlEngine (whatever that
> represents).
>
> It would be possible to add another factory implementation, provided
> that it had a different language name and default extension.
>
> Or the JexlScriptEngine could be sensitive to particu
On 30/07/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
> Thanks again for the explanation.
>
> Just one question: are we "exposing" Jexl or UnifiedJEXL ? (or both)
The code I'm working on currently uses JexlEngine (whatever that represents).
It would be possible to add another factory implementation, provided
that it
Thanks again for the explanation.
Just one question: are we "exposing" Jexl or UnifiedJEXL ? (or both)
BTW, just a stupid thought about logging (versus usage of a Writer -
ScriptContext.setErrorWriter), I guess we could use a simple Log
implementation that wraps the error Writer and pass it down
Ok, thank you both for the explanation.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-JEXL--2.0-and-BSF---JSR-223-tp24706519p24733769.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubs
