pste...@apache.org wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Thu Jul 30 01:22:23 2009
New Revision: 799149
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799149&view=rev
Log:
Dropped files not included in release from tag.
Removed:
commons/proper/math/tags/MATH_2_0_RC2/src/experimental/
commons/proper/math/t
On 30/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> I have to step out in a minute or two (I can try later), but what I'd
> >> try is to make the complete transition to the standard directory
> >> layout:
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> I have to step out in a minute or two (I can try later), but what I'd
>> try is to make the complete transition to the standard directory
>> layout:
>>
>> 1) Move sources to src/main/java
>>
>> 2) Move tests
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[snip]
> I have to step out in a minute or two (I can try later), but what I'd
> try is to make the complete transition to the standard directory
> layout:
>
> 1) Move sources to src/main/java
>
> 2) Move tests to src/test/java
>
> 3) Remove following from pom:
> src/ja
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
>> >> > Author: sebb
>> >> > Date: Wed Jul 29 20:02:42 2009
>> >> > Ne
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:35 PM, wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Wed Jul 29 22:35:15 2009
New Revision: 799105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799105&view=rev
Log:
Put copyright notices in NOTICE.txt, clean up LICENSE.txt (mostly
s/used/translated)
Modified:
com
On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
> >> > Author: sebb
> >> > Date: Wed Jul 29 20:02:42 2009
> >> > New Revision: 799042
> >> >
> >> > URL: http://svn.
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:35 PM, wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Wed Jul 29 22:35:15 2009
> New Revision: 799105
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799105&view=rev
> Log:
> Put copyright notices in NOTICE.txt, clean up LICENSE.txt (mostly
> s/used/translated)
>
> Modified:
> commons/pr
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
>> > Author: sebb
>> > Date: Wed Jul 29 20:02:42 2009
>> > New Revision: 799042
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799042&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Add s
On 29/07/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
> > Author: sebb
> > Date: Wed Jul 29 20:02:42 2009
> > New Revision: 799042
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799042&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add services file for autodiscovery of Jexl script factory
>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:02 PM, wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Wed Jul 29 20:02:42 2009
> New Revision: 799042
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799042&view=rev
> Log:
> Add services file for autodiscovery of Jexl script factory
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/jexl/branches/2.0/src/java/MET
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Henrib wrote:
>
> sebb-2-2 wrote:
>>
>> Of course if you try to use the new classes on Java 1.5 without also
>> providing BSF 3.0 the JVM will complain, but otherwise the Jexl jar
>> will run fine on Java 1.5.
>>
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand this correctly. Are
On 29/07/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
>
>
> sebb-2-2 wrote:
> >
> > Of course if you try to use the new classes on Java 1.5 without also
> > providing BSF 3.0 the JVM will complain, but otherwise the Jexl jar
> > will run fine on Java 1.5.
> >
>
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand this correctly. Are
sebb-2-2 wrote:
>
> Of course if you try to use the new classes on Java 1.5 without also
> providing BSF 3.0 the JVM will complain, but otherwise the Jexl jar
> will run fine on Java 1.5.
>
I'm sorry I don't understand this correctly. Are you saying that that BSF3.0
will become an added depe
On 29/07/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Donald Woods a écrit :
>
> > The NOTICE file needs to include a complete copy of any third-party
> > conditions and not just a link to them.
> >
> > See the W3C notice in the Geronimo server [1] for how to handle cases
> > where the license states - "...mu
Donald Woods a écrit :
> The NOTICE file needs to include a complete copy of any third-party
> conditions and not just a link to them.
>
> See the W3C notice in the Geronimo server [1] for how to handle cases
> where the license states - "...must retain the above copyright notice,
> this list of c
The NOTICE file needs to include a complete copy of any third-party
conditions and not just a link to them.
See the W3C notice in the Geronimo server [1] for how to handle cases
where the license states - "...must retain the above copyright notice,
this list of conditions and the following dis
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Phil Steitz wrote:
I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
"
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>
>>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
>>
>> "The Apache com
On 29/07/2009, Henrib wrote:
>
> Could we envision this JSR-233 as a second & optional jar.
No; the whole point is that the classes need to be in the same jar.
> Many of us are still stuck with Java5 and having to add the javax.api as a
> dependency to Jexl could be inconvenient.
> May be we
Could we envision this JSR-233 as a second & optional jar.
Many of us are still stuck with Java5 and having to add the javax.api as a
dependency to Jexl could be inconvenient.
May be we can expose what is necessary from Jexl for the jsr-233 to be
efficiently implemented but still leave it as an op
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Phil Steitz wrote:
I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
"The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents
with
separate copyrig
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>
>>> Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
"The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents
with
separate copyright notices
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Phil Steitz wrote:
I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
"The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with
separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
code for the t
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Phil Steitz wrote:
I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
"The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with
separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
code for the t
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I don't think the following addition to LICENSE.txt is appropriate:
>>
>> "The Apache commons-math library includes a number of subcomponents with
>> separate copyright notices and license terms. Your use of the source
>> code for the these subcomponent
I found commons-net-2.0.jar for JDK 1.4, go to
http://www.zehon.com/downloads_compat.htm
JIRA j...@apache.org wrote:
>
> FTPClient.retrieveFileStream hangs occassionally
>
>
> Key: NET-152
> URL: https://issues.
27 matches
Mail list logo
