To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Steitz"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 2:57 PM
Subject: [math] 2.0 RC1 available for review
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/
Looks good to me.
-
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:ebo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 12:29 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2
>
> Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> > Actually, RequiredCharsetNames is like [lang]'s CharEncoding
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/
Seems good to me.
Thanks Phil,
Luc
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@c
pste...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Sat Jul 25 20:56:49 2009
> New Revision: 797834
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797834&view=rev
> Log:
> Minor edits.
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/math/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Modified: commons/proper/math/trunk/RELEASE-N
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math-2.0-RC1/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
[snip]
> More on the 2.4.1 src assembly version here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/wqqs67eyi6hq3mcq
>
> -Rahul
Time to upgrade Maven then :))
BTW: Which is the minimal JDK version for net-1.5.0 ?
Additionally:
build.xml sets title of javadoc to "Apache Commons Net
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared a second release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback (thanks!) from the first.
Although it seems we're heading to RC3, I simply wanna report that the
version builds from the source tarball fine with my compiler zoo.
- Jörg
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Rory Winston wrote:
>
>> (As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
>>
>> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
>>
>> Binaries/sources etc:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC4/
>
Rory Winston wrote:
> (As per Nialls request, I have created a new RC)
>
> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_1_5_0_RC4/
>
> Binaries/sources etc:
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-1.5.0-RC4/
>
> Fixes:
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavi
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> Rory Winston wrote:
>
> > Hi folks
> >
> > Fix release for the 2.0 branch.
> >
> > Binaries/sources etc:
> > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/
> >
> > Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_R
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Rory Winston wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> Fix release for the 2.0 branch.
>>
>> Binaries/sources etc:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/
>>
>> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC1/
>>
>> Fixes:
>>
>
https://issues.a
Rory Winston wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> Fix release for the 2.0 branch.
>
> Binaries/sources etc:
> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/
>
> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC1/
>
> Fixes:
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.js
Gary Gregory a écrit :
Actually, RequiredCharsetNames is like [lang]'s CharEncoding [1]
(http://commons.apache.org/lang/api/org/apache/commons/lang/CharEncoding.htm). But
we've never wanted this kind of dependency from codec->lang.
In work code, we have used [lang]'s CharEncoding and our own
> -Original Message-
> From: Emmanuel Bourg [mailto:ebo...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 11:13 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2
>
> I looked quickly at the new classes, I'm not convinced by the benefit of
> the RequiredChar
I looked quickly at the new classes, I'm not convinced by the benefit of
the RequiredCharsetNames class in the codec API. I understand it's
useful internally to factorize some string constants in the classes, but
as a user I don't think I would ever use it myself.
Regarding the StringBytesUtil
Oops, fixing...
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 10:30 AM
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r797804 - in /commons/proper/codec/trunk/src:
> java/org/apache/commons/codec/ test/org/apache/commons/codec/
>
> On
On 25/07/2009, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Sat Jul 25 17:27:04 2009
> New Revision: 797804
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797804&view=rev
> Log:
> Javadocs. Make our exceptions fit the Java 1.4 pattern. 100%/100%
> line/branch code coverage for the main p
I have increased the code coverage with some refactorings and otherwise made
some small code clean ups in trunk. URLCodec and QuotePrintableCodec are both
at 100%/100% line/branch code coverage now.
I think there is a more room for improvements in code coverage, so I would
encourage anyone to
Found no other points than the ones already mentioned in this vote thread.
So +1
Oliver
Niall Pemberton schrieb:
I have prepared a second release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
feedback (thanks!) from the first.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC2
[ ] -1 No, because...
The tag
22 matches
Mail list logo