Adding Sanselan to commons home/wiki page

2009-07-15 Thread Ashish
Folks, It will be great if we can add Sanselan to the commons proper list on http://commons.apache.org/ Google search still take one to incubator page and then one is lost. Fortunately, the news section helped me back track it to commons. Let me know, if i can be of any help. -- thanks ashish

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-07-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[jira] Created: (DBCP-297) Ciphered passwords

2009-07-15 Thread Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
Hi, As discussed here some weeks ago in OpenEJB dev's list, I finally decided to add this feature in commons dbcp because it seemed to me more relevant (instead of having it in OpenEJB itself). Any feedback ? Jean-Louis -Message d'origine- De : Jean-Louis MONTEIRO (JIRA) [mailto:j...@..

Re: [codec] 1.4 release: code coverage help needed

2009-07-15 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Gary, CODEC-78 created and patch attached to address this. I used IntelliJ's EMMA. Hopefully Code Coverage results are similar! yours, Julius On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Taking a quick look at the Cobertura coverage line/branch reports: > > Base64InputStream 8

Re: [JEXL] Unified syntax and 2.0 release (was: Is JEXL ...)

2009-07-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Henrib wrote: > > > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> Also, since the 2.0 branch has moved to JDK 1.5, might make sense to >> look at the hundreds of raw types usage and other warnings etc (if >> someone has cycles to allocate, that is). >> > > I'm not sure I understand

RE: [codec] 1.4 release: code coverage help needed

2009-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Taking a quick look at the Cobertura coverage line/branch reports: Base64InputStream 85%/76% Base64OutputStream 88%/70% Gary > -Original Message- > From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:55 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [

Re: [codec] 1.4 release: code coverage help needed

2009-07-15 Thread Julius Davies
Hi, Gary, I think the streaming Base64 is adequately exercised by the tests inside Base64InputStreamTest.java and Base64OutputStreamTest.java. It's also worth noting that all the original Base64 operations are now implemented via the streaming, so the original unit tests from 1.3 provide a good wo

[codec] 1.4 release: code coverage help needed

2009-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Hello All: I would like to ask your help to improve test coverage especially for the new code. Perhaps the author of the new streaming Base64 classes would like to help here since they know the code the best. If you are a committer, commit, if not please submit a patch. Gary ---

RE: [codec] 1.4 release: contributors in project.xml

2009-07-15 Thread Gary Gregory
I added these three contributors to pom.xml. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 1:15 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [codec] 1.4 release: contributors in project.xml > > Hi, > > Should we add the fol

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-07-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

Re: [JEXL] Unified syntax and 2.0 release (was: Is JEXL ...)

2009-07-15 Thread Henrib
Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > Also, since the 2.0 branch has moved to JDK 1.5, might make sense to > look at the hundreds of raw types usage and other warnings etc (if > someone has cycles to allocate, that is). > I'm not sure I understand what you mean; my apologies if I'm missing the obvious. Sh

[VFS] How to fix concurrency issues in SftpFileSystem

2009-07-15 Thread Arjen van Staalduinen
hello, I'm trying to create a patch for a concurrency issue I've come across in the VFS SftpFileSystem, but I'm a bit confused what the general idea of coping with this kind of problem in VFS is. I see a lot of synchronized blocks that use the filesystem as a lock object in FileObject implementati

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-07-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati