People use it but I personally did not have the cycles (or a usecase)
for further development.
What would you like to see fixed?
cheers
--
Torsten
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 21:43, Liam Coughlin wrote:
> Is this project still active? there's a 1.1 release sort of sitting dormant
> since ~2007...
>
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> As pointed out http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#charsets and
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816/#charsets define the valid
> characters for XML 1.0 and 1.1.
>
> However, the escape functionality is actually different. If you transport
> XML (or HT
On 30/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 30/06/2009, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Tue Jun 30 05:09:01 2009
> > New Revision: 789561
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789561&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Added todo note
> >
> > Modified:
> >
> commons/prope
On 30/06/2009, bay...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Tue Jun 30 05:09:01 2009
> New Revision: 789561
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789561&view=rev
> Log:
> Added todo note
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/translate
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote at Dienstag, 30. Juni 2009 09:15:
> Now that the StringEscape system has a foundation to support
> whatever's needed (one hopes) the next step is to define exactly what
> escaping XML should do. As Jörg notes in LANG-66, XML is different for
> XML 1.0 and 1.1. Great, l
Now that the StringEscape system has a foundation to support
whatever's needed (one hopes) the next step is to define exactly what
escaping XML should do. As Jörg notes in LANG-66, XML is different for
XML 1.0 and 1.1. Great, let's support both then. StringEscapeUtils can
support the old method (fo
