Re: sanctioning commons-logging version "99.0-does-not-exist"

2009-06-09 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hi Erik, Thank you for the information about the typo. Unfortunately, the 0.0.0-EMPTY initiative was shut down due to opposition by Jochen Wiedmann and Rahul Akolkar among others. Other voices favorable to the initiative were not heard or were not persistent enough. Anyway, we'll have to resort

Re: [POOL] 1.5-RC2 soak test errors

2009-06-09 Thread sebb
On 09/06/2009, Rainer Jung wrote: > I wanted to add another non-critical testing observation concering the > 1.5 release. > > I tested on Solaris Sparc on a somewhat slow/old system (V125, 1GHz > UltraSparc IIIi). The failed tests were testEviction() and > testEviction2() in TestGKOP. Both fai

Re: sanctioning commons-logging version "99.0-does-not-exist"

2009-06-09 Thread Erik van Oosten
Not sure where to report this. There is a tiny typo in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/logging_empty/trunk/pom.xml Please search for the text "0.0.0-EMPPTY", with 2 P's. Regards, Erik. PS. Ceki, very good idea you presented in this thread. Ceki Gulcu wrote: > > Henri Y

Re: [POOL] 1.5-RC2 soak test errors

2009-06-09 Thread Rainer Jung
I wanted to add another non-critical testing observation concering the 1.5 release. I tested on Solaris Sparc on a somewhat slow/old system (V125, 1GHz UltraSparc IIIi). The failed tests were testEviction() and testEviction2() in TestGKOP. Both failures were due to timing issues. The call to evic