This should have gone to the dev list.
On May 31, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On May 31, 2009, at 9:24 AM, chris0 wrote:
Hello,
I'm making this proposal because I couldn't find a good solution to a
problem that I recently had.
What I wanted to do was to configure an application
Great work man.!!!
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available:
>
>http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
>
> GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file
> system on top of the Google App Engine for Java
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
> >
> > java version "1.6.0_13"
> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
> > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
> >
> > and I got yet another different error:
Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
It kind of depends on what you're proposing... a new component? Probably start
a discussion on this list. Enhancements to an existing component? Either
start here on the list or open a JIRA issue.
Does this help?
-Matt
--- On Sun, 5/31/09, chris0 wrote:
> From: chris0
> Subject: How to
sebb wrote:
Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
java version "1.6.0_13"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
and I got yet another different error:
-
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > sebb wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6:
java version "1.6.0_13"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing)
and I got yet another different error:
---
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > sebb wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks to all who p
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thank
I would be very happy if you could reference it from the Commons VFS web
site as a 3rd party plug-in. (Yes, the GaeVFS jar does contain a
vfs-providers.xml configuration, so there's no need to add it to
providers.xml).
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On May 30, 2009, at 2:5
There are two reasons for this:
1. GAE does not set the "os.arch" or "os.version" system properties.
When Commons VFS initializes, it tries to do this (OS.java line 36), which
throws NullPointerExceptions:
* private* *static* *final* String *OS_ARCH* = System.*getProperty*(
"os.arch").toLow
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks!
-for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
-for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
+
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> > -for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> > +for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
> >
> pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
> > -for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
> > +fo
s...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks!
-for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+for (int i = 0; i < smallPrimes.length; i++) {
pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]);
-for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
+for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) { // TODO why 5?
No
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in RC2
On May 31, 2009, at 2:44 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
There is no need to add this to VFS's providers.xml as a vfs plugin
is able to provides its own vfs-providers.xml [1] which will be
loaded by VFS then automatically.
Thanks for reminding me. Then I wonder what the requirement that th
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability i
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > > > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes in RC2
> > > > >
> > > > > * Fixed c
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > >
> > > Changes in RC2
> > >
> > > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > > * Restored development reports
> > > * Improved thread-safety and
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> >
> > Changes in RC2
> >
> > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > * Restored development reports
> > * Improved thr
sebb wrote:
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
Unfortunately not enou
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> > On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> > >
> > > Changes in RC2
> > >
> > > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > > * Restored development reports
> > > * Improved thr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
Changes in RC2
* Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
* Restored development reports
* Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
thanks, sebb!
* Added link to release javadoc in si
On 31/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
> >
> > Changes in RC2
> >
> > * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> > * Restored development reports
> > * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
>
> Changes in RC2
>
> * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> * Restored development reports
> * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
> thanks, sebb!
Unfortunately not enough, see be
Hello,
Suppose I wanted to make a proposal for something to be included in Commons,
is there any particular way I should go about it, or should I just post it
in this forum?
Thanks,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-a-proposal-tp23802008p23802008.html
Se
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Emmanuel,
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:38 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> James Ring a écrit :
>
> > I think partial matching should be disabled by default. While a neat
> > feature to reduce typing, this behaviour will probably come as a
> > surprise to people because it is not found in most programs
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1.
>
> Changes in RC2
>
> * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt
> * Restored development reports
> * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests -
> thanks, sebb!
> * Added link to release javadoc in site.xml
>
Hi!
>> http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
cool stuff!
> This is kind of cool. My first thought was that it might be nice to
> include it in VFS itself, but after looking at
> http://code.google.com/appengine/terms.html
> I have my doubts that including this at Apache would be doable even
> as a
ss
The distribution looks good. If you have to make a 3rd release candidate
you may want to add a test on setConfig() and setFactory() in
GenericKeyedObjectPool to improve the coverage. But don't hold the
release for this.
Emmanuel Bourg
Phil Steitz a écrit :
Thanks to all who provided feedba
35 matches
Mail list logo
