sebb wrote:
On 30/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
The files are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/
findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
On 30/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The files are here:
> > >
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/
> > >
> > >
> >
> > findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
> >
> >
> This is
sebb wrote:
On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
The files are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/
findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
This is intended. The associated reports are not enabled in the release
pom, so ther
On 29/05/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > The files are here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/
>
>
> findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
>
> RELEASE-NOTES.txt is missing from the SVN tag.
>
> NOTICE.txt
I think that packages are nice and all, but commons.math is pretty
aggressive about balkanizing the name space.
+1 for merging.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Sam Halliday wrote:
> I recommend that the decompositions package be simply merged into the
> linear
> package.
>
--
Ted Dunning, C
On 29/05/2009, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
>
>
> > DOAP file does not have an AL header (not a blocker, I'll fix trunk)
> >
>
> Does it matter since it's a simple descriptor that is not distributed?
DOAPs aren't included in the source archive - i.e. they are not part
of the release -
Woot! Thanks for your help on this. I'm away for the next few days but will
take a look early next week.
Mark
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Phil Steitz
> To: Commons Developers List
> Sent: 29/05/09, 03:36:21
> Subject: [pool] 1.5-RC1 available for review
>
> The files are here:
Emmanuel:
I couldn't speak to the original intent, of course. I would support anything
that would make JXPath less brittle--it's just been that given the existence of
XPath 2, it's been somewhat an expectation that any substantial rewrite of
JXPath would also incorporate support for the late
sebb a écrit :
DOAP file does not have an AL header (not a blocker, I'll fix trunk)
Does it matter since it's a simple descriptor that is not distributed?
There is no point claiming copyright on such a file.
Emmanuel Bourg
---
On 29/05/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The files are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/
findbugs filter and license-header.txt are missing from source archives.
RELEASE-NOTES.txt is missing from the SVN tag.
NOTICE.txt has 2008.
I'm not sure why, but the $Id: SVN tag
Sam Halliday a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> The decompositions in the linear package have been given their own
> package... I'm just flagging up a concern (prior to the release of the API
> for 2.0) that this might make things tricky in the future. The current
> implementations of the decompositions ar
I played a bit with JXPath today to implement the ends-with() function.
I thought it would be a quick copy&paste of the starts-with() function,
but that was a little more tricky. The function is referenced in several
places, and I had to regenerate the parser with JavaCC.
I wonder if it would
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
My observations:
- ErodingPerKeyKeyedObjectPool is not covered by the tests
- The changes for the 1.2 release do not appear on the site. This is
due to tags in changes.xml
- in changes.xml, there are HTML elements but their content do not
appear on the page generated (fo
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
Dear all,
The decompositions in the linear package have been given their own
package... I'm just flagging up a concern (prior to the release of the API
for 2.0) that this might make things tricky in the future. The current
implementations of the decompositions are nice and general, but we will ha
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 12:33 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Paul Libbrecht a écrit :
> > So commits in svn and in git are "compatible" ?
>
> You can't commit to Git, the mirror is read-only. SVN commits are
> automatically pushed to the Git mirror.
>
> It's just a convenience for external develop
My observations:
- ErodingPerKeyKeyedObjectPool is not covered by the tests
- The changes for the 1.2 release do not appear on the site. This is due
to tags in changes.xml
- in changes.xml, there are HTML elements but their content do not
appear on the page generated (for POOL-86 for example).
17 matches
Mail list logo
