[pool] 1.5-RC1 available for review

The files are here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-pool-1.5-RC1/ The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_RC1/ Have at it! Thanks! Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

On May 28, 2009, at 12:11 PM, sebb wrote: Cool, then will take a look at the patches after my holiday then :-) ICLA expected :-) Cheers Jexl is used by JMeter, so I have an interest in bug fixes, and may be able to help out. Jexl is used in a bunch of places. I recently added something

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons JCI -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=193516&projectId=142 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Thu 28 May 2009 14:37:14 -0700 Finished at: Thu 28 May 2009 14:41:22 -0700 Total time: 4m 7s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

sebb a écrit : I've now done the other Commons proper projects in trunk. There will be some other incorrect DOAP files in branches, but none of them are currently listed in files.xml so they won't affect the projects web-site. Also added Exec and Proxy to files.xml as they were missing. Thank

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

On 28/05/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier > > wrote: > Is there still any committer interested in releasing JEXL 2.0? > > >>> > >>> I have some interest (I did work

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: Is there still any committer interested in releasing JEXL 2.0? >>> >>> I have some interest (I did work through to get 1.1 out) but its >>> really not high priority. Lef

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> Is there still any committer interested in releasing JEXL 2.0? >>> >> >> I have some interest (I did work through to get 1.1 out) but its >> really not high priority. Left to me, it may realistically be weeks >> before things like JEX

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

>> Is there still any committer interested in releasing JEXL 2.0? >> > > I have some interest (I did work through to get 1.1 out) but its > really not high priority. Left to me, it may realistically be weeks > before things like JEXL-55 get looked at. Obviously, if someone else > jumps in, that cou

Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation

In preparation for the post-2.0 discussions, I've created three issues on the tracker to deal with the consolidation of F2J (aka JLAPACK), netlib-java and matrix-toolkits-java. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-269 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-270 http://issues.apache.org/

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Henrib wrote: > > Rahul, Christian, > Thank you for you advice. > > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >>  * I understand its convenient to attach one zip, but it makes it a little >> harder to review >> > > I usually use patch files but since many files are impacted (not

Re: [cli] Git mirror available

Paul Libbrecht a écrit : So commits in svn and in git are "compatible" ? You can't commit to Git, the mirror is read-only. SVN commits are automatically pushed to the Git mirror. It's just a convenience for external developers wishing to work on the code. Emmanuel Bourg ---

Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and consolidation

I discovered/remembered something that might make the inclusion of Java source translated BLAS/LAPACK code troublesome. The F2J translator does a two step process... it generates Java from the Fortran, but then has to do some jiggery-pokery to the class file to handle GOTO statements. That means a

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

On 28/05/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, sebb wrote: > > On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote: > >> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the

Re: [codec] any takers for CODEC-75 patch?

Hi, First of all, thanks for taking a look at the patch. Regarding this: >>> 1. Ability to decode base64 streams which are missing the final >>> padding characters. >> >> That changes the behaviour; there may be some applications that rely >> on detecting invalid Base64 data. >> >> IMO this new

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

Rahul, Christian, Thank you for you advice. Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > * I understand its convenient to attach one zip, but it makes it a little > harder to review > I usually use patch files but since many files are impacted (not counting those generated by javacc), I thought it would be mor

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 3:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote: >> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: >>  > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>  > >>  >  > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please? >>  > >>  > >>  > Just as a note - there's

Re: [codec] any takers for CODEC-75 patch?

On May 28, 2009, at 4:33 AM, sebb wrote: On 28/05/2009, Julius Davies wrote: Hi, I created CODEC-75 (url-safe Base64) and attached a 20KB patch to the ticket. Anyone interested in committing this? The patch improves codec's base64 handling in two ways: 1. Ability to decode base64 streams

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote: >> On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: >>  > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >>  > >>  >  > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please? >>  > >>  > >>  > Just as a note - there's

Re: [SCXML] DOAP (was: svn commit: r779531)

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:14 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Thu May 28 10:14:05 2009 > New Revision: 779531 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=779531&view=rev > Log: > Re-Fix DOAP tags > > Modified: >    commons/proper/scxml/trunk/doap_scxml.rdf > > Modified: commons/proper/scxml/trunk/

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

On 28/05/2009, sebb wrote: > On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please? > > > > > > Just as a note - there's no reason why someone can't do all of them if > > th

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons IO -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=193439&projectId=155 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 28 May 2009 03:38:38 -0700 Finished at: Thu 28 May 2009 03:40:51 -0700 Total time: 2m 12s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [codec] any takers for CODEC-75 patch?

On 28/05/2009, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, > > I created CODEC-75 (url-safe Base64) and attached a 20KB patch to the > ticket. Anyone interested in committing this? > > The patch improves codec's base64 handling in two ways: > > > 1. Ability to decode base64 streams which are missing the final

Re: [all] Incorrect release info in the doap files

On 28/05/2009, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > > Could everyone look at their projects and fix the files please? > > > Just as a note - there's no reason why someone can't do all of them if > they want. BTW, the DOAPs are referenced from http: