Bill,
Did you commit those changes?
I ask because I see similar issues with abstract and static classes. Gamma
is an example of the static class issue. This class has only static
methods, but it is marked as serializable (why?). ContinuedFraction is a
good example of an abstract class that is
Ok, most of the rest look like transient classes (e.g. all of
linear.decomposition). So asking for what needs to be Serialized, and what
doesn't.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Barker"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2009 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [math] Seriali
- Original Message -
From: "Niall Pemberton"
To: "Commons Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [math] top-level package name
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Perf testing has gone well so far. I have one more batch of javadoc /
> ridiculously-long-line elimination changes to commit and then I will cut an
> RC. There are a couple of things that I want to get community input on
> before plowing for
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Luc Maisonobe
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>>>
>>>
So let's vote on this proposal: change the top level package name on
[math] from org.apache.commons.m
I added (but have not yet committed) the following test case to validate
the WHEN_EXHAUSTED_GROW contract.
public void testWhenExhaustedGrow() throws Exception {
pool.setMaxActive(1);
pool.setMaxTotal(1);
pool.setWhenExhaustedAction(GenericObjectPool.WHEN_EXHAUSTED_GROW);
In order to reduce the number of actors, i'd like to propose to statr
with step 3 (voting Sanselan out of incubatgion). Should reduce the
noise for considerable number of people.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Charles Matthew Chen
wrote:
> Sounds right to me. Thanks Craig.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> O
Sounds right to me. Thanks Craig.
Matthew
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Here's my take on graduating Sanselan from incubator to commons.
>
> 1. Sanselan has been accepted by Commons.
> 2. The active committers have been granted write access to the repository.
>
> Re
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo.
+1. I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll
releases. I also favor having the www website focussed on current
de
> From: Phil Steitz
>
> Perf testing has gone well so far.
Great news.
> 0) @author tags.
Leave/delete - happy either way with a slight preference for delete.
> 1) Release process.
Sounds good to me.
Mark
-
To unsubscrib
> From: Phil Steitz
>
> Perf testing has gone well so far.
Great news.
> 0) @author tags.
Leave/delete - happy either way with a slight preference for delete.
> 1) Release process.
Sounds good to me.
Mark
-
To unsubscrib
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> We're the victims of an experiment that was only half completed imo.
>>
>
> +1. I tend to remove the development reports when I cut RCs and roll
> releases. I also favor having the www website focussed on current
> development, with prior
13 matches
Mail list logo
