I've been looking over the Field implementations, and it looks like it's
mostly done except for FieldPolynomial. I'm not really sure which
package this should go in, since o.a.c.m.analysis.polynomial seems to be
about Real polynomials. Any hints would be appreciated.
I could provide implement
Hi
I'm a java developer. I am now using Apache Commons Pool 1.4. I
encounter the following problems. I use PoolableObjectFactory and
GenericObjectPool. The configuration for GenericObjectPool is:
2
-1
-1
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=190689&projectId=161
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 23 Apr 2009 17:31:06 -0700
Finished at: Thu 23 Apr 2009 17:32:26 -0700
Total time: 1m 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
Hi all,
Thanks to Dennis for bringing this to my attention :)
Sorry for chiming in so late but I wasn't subscribed to the list and unaware of the discussion going on about our migration to slf4j at
Pluto, Jetspeed-2, and in time probably all our Apache Portals projects.
I just read through th
Sure, but I'd start with describing and discussing new features before
starting to code.
Torsten Curdt wrote:
> What if one would create an JCL 2.0 experimental branch?
> Would that be OK for everyone?
>
> cheers
> --
> Torsten
>
>
Hi, as per this thread -
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel/102683
I was wondering if I could have commit access to the Commons Validator
sandbox, to help out with the JSR-303 Bean Validation implementation, to
go along with the API I'm working on over in the Apache Geroni
> Well, it may involve a bit more work now - which I don't mind doing -
> but adding a new archiver should be easier, as it would not have to do
> the state checking.
>
> The idea is to have the re-usable code in the abstract super-class.
I completly understand your point. But does this bring so m
On 23/04/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >> Similarly for other methods. The Abstract class would be responsible
> >> for maintaining the current state and checking that the method is
> >> valid for the state.
> >
> > Hm ... sounds a
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Similarly for other methods. The Abstract class would be responsible
>> for maintaining the current state and checking that the method is
>> valid for the state.
>
> Hm ... sounds a bit like overkill to me.
for me too.. I had this discussio
> Similarly for other methods. The Abstract class would be responsible
> for maintaining the current state and checking that the method is
> valid for the state.
Hm ... sounds a bit like overkill to me.
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To un
I think it would be possible to enforce the correct sequence of API
calls in the AbstractxxStream classes.
This could be done as follows:
public finish(){
throw Exception if state is invalid
set state to finish
finish0();
}
// Override this if the sub-class needs to do anything.
protected
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/04/2009, grobme...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: grobmeier
>> Date: Thu Apr 23 05:30:06 2009
>> New Revision: 767804
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=767804&view=rev
>> Log:
>> added javadocs
>
> And reflowed some code lines - bu
On 23/04/2009, grobme...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Thu Apr 23 05:30:06 2009
> New Revision: 767804
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=767804&view=rev
> Log:
> added javadocs
And reflowed some code lines - but why?
They were not all that long, and IMO the new versio
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
On 2009-04-22 16:17:52 GMT, John Bollinger wrote:
> Furthermore, it seems clear that the class loading issues CL has
> exhibited, though mitigated in recent releases, are probably going to
> continue to present problems for some CL 1.x uses for the foreseeable
> future. (The irony of a convenie
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-betwixt has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
16 matches
Mail list logo
