Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Phil, On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: The last item before graduation is activity and diversity, which are lacking. There were a few developers during the project but now we have only one active developer. And it's not clear that we will be able any

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

Hi Phil, On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: The last item before graduation is activity and diversity, which are lacking. There were a few developers during the project but now we have only one active developer. And it's not clear that we will be able any time soon to attract

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi, The Sanselan podling [1] has been incubating since 2007 and has achieved most of the goals in incubation: Code has been released [2] according to the incubator release guidelines Status is up to date [3] Community mailing lists are responded to promptly [5] JIRA iss

Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library

Hi, Craig, I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics (despite the name, this is not only about XML) a better place. Nevertheless, I'd vote in favour of Sanselan, if it comes to that. On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.2 RC3

Henri Yandell wrote: +1 from me. sigs pass. source happily rebuilds. release notes matches JIRA. license/notice look good. items in release notes all look good. +1 Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.

[Commons-VFS] Use URI as FileName holder. Was: Re: Commons-VFS SVN commit permission

Mario, In most cases GenericFileName or LocalFileName is used. Both of them can be represented as "native" URI. LayeredFileName (the one with "!" syntax) can't be used with "native" URI, of course. It's still possible to use URI as internal storage for GeneriFileName and get rid of several method

Re: [MATH] Any need to keep Maven1 build and associated files?

Luc Maisonobe wrote: sebb a écrit : The Ant build file is recent, and should be kept, but there seems little point keeping the Maven1 build files. OK if I delete them? Yes, go ahead. +1 for deleting, but let's keep a working Ant build Phil Luc --

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Math -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=188659&projectId=21 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 18 Apr 2009 05:32:28 -0700 Finished at: Sat 18 Apr 2009 05:33:40 -0700 Total time: 1m 12s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Codec -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=188557&projectId=159 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 18 Apr 2009 01:30:41 -0700 Finished at: Sat 18 Apr 2009 01:31:04 -0700 Total time: 23s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numbe