Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Vinod Kumar Badhavat
Hi Guillaume Nodet I'm ready and happy to work on SSHD subproject. My intention is to take part in open source development, so even if I'm selected or not ( for GSoC), I would love to work for open source. As a part of proposal writing, I learnt many things about SSH protocol and hence working on

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 22:42, Vinod Kumar Badhavat wrote: > Hi Guillaume Nodet > > Thank you for your information. I applied to Apache as a part of Google > Summer of Code(GSoC), so I think, I should stick to the proposal I made in > the application and implement SSH as a part of commons-net. I w

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Vinod Kumar Badhavat
Hi Guillaume Nodet Thank you for your information. I applied to Apache as a part of Google Summer of Code(GSoC), so I think, I should stick to the proposal I made in the application and implement SSH as a part of commons-net. I would like to use SSHD's key and algorithm negotiation. I'm planning t

Re: [compress] Debugflag in Tar classes

2009-04-11 Thread sebb
On 09/04/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-04-09, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > Sine I really don't like those System.err.println stuff I would like > > to remove it from the classes including the debug flag. > > > +1 > +1 > > Stefan > > >

Re: [configuration] attribute splitting WAS Re: [jira] Commented: (CONFIGURATION-335) XMLConfiguration: Can't disable attribute splitting

2009-04-11 Thread Ralph Goers
On Apr 11, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: (Maybe it's better to have this discussion on the mailing list.) The implementation of attributes in the experimental branch was probably incomplete - the node handlers only supported single attribute values, XMLConfiguration still had this

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Guillaume Nodet
In case you haven't followed the earlier discussion, you may want to have a look at the Apache SSHD project, which implements an SSH server and some parts of the client. The client is far from complete, so it may be a good idea to join our forces: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sshd/trunk

Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?

2009-04-11 Thread Ralph Goers
On Apr 11, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Actually I'd be against SLF4J. Additionally I also prefer commons- logging compared to j.u.l. Why would you be against SLF4J? I assume that means if I changed it to use SLF4J you would vote -1 on the code commit? Does that apply to any

Re: [Logging] was Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?

2009-04-11 Thread Ralph Goers
On Apr 11, 2009, at 2:41 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: I (might still) have some (very) experimental code. But the "significant improvement over SLF4J" might be debatable ...and I am done debating about logging ;-) Whatever that experimental code is I'd love to see it. It might give me good ide

Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?

2009-04-11 Thread Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger wrote: > Ralph Goers schrieb: >> I just noticed that this was changed from commons.logging. I'm very >> strongly opposed to using j.u.l. I much prefer a logging abstraction. >> While I'm not in love with commons-logging and would prefer SLF4J, using >> commons-logging is better than

Re: [Logging] was Re: [Configuration] experimental branch uses java.util.logging?

2009-04-11 Thread Torsten Curdt
> All that really doesn't say much. IMO it does ;) > The primary difference is simply around > how the community is run. Exactly > The real question is, if one was to create a commons logging 2.0 what would > it be and would that be a significant improvement over SLF4J and the > existing common

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-11 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Vinod Kumar Badhavat
Sergey ok, i got the point and Thank you very much. Vinod. On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Sergey Vladimirov wrote: > Vinod, > The sudjestion was not to implement independed clases, but just split > commons-net and (commons-ssh?) ssh implementation. Put it in another > JAR. It's okay to have d

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Sergey Vladimirov
Vinod, The sudjestion was not to implement independed clases, but just split commons-net and (commons-ssh?) ssh implementation. Put it in another JAR. It's okay to have dependency from this SSH implementation to commons-net and use things like SocketClient. Other way (commons-net with SSH) may cre

Re: SSH Implementation - IDEA and seeking Suggestions.

2009-04-11 Thread Vinod Kumar Badhavat
Hi Sergey Vladimi Thank you for your valuable suggestions. "SSHConnectionFactory", to setup connection parameters is a nice idea and I'll include that in my SSH implementation. I thought to use SocketClient and related stuff from commons-net to have socket I/O. I need to talk to my mentor regardi