I should probably put this comment onto the issue itself, but for very large
values of lambda, the sampled count becomes very close to Gaussian which
would imply that there are very simple rejection algorithms based on
standard techniques such as sampling from the normal or Lorentzian and
rejecting
Brent Worden wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I will look at MATH-197 if Brent does not catch this.
Thanks for nudging me to actually contribute something. :)
I added a rejection method for Poisson random variables. As Luc
mentioned in the issue, the original approach experienced numerical
inst
Phil Steitz wrote:
I will look at MATH-197 if Brent does not catch this.
Thanks for nudging me to actually contribute something. :)
I added a rejection method for Poisson random variables. As Luc
mentioned in the issue, the original approach experienced numerical
instability for larger me
On 05/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > s...@apache.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were
> > inserted
> > > > earlier to elim
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 10:08 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [vfs] next release?
>
> The next release of VFS will be 2.0. I've been working on cleaning the
> code in preparation for a rel
+1
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> +1 welcome!
>
> Phil
>
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > This is not official project manifest, just few things
> > so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
> > to settle in the commons at the first place.
> >
> > The project is comp
+1 welcome!
Phil
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all
This is not official project manifest, just few things
so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
to settle in the commons at the first place.
The project is completely different from other
commons projects, because it contains platform
+1
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This is not official project manifest, just few things
> so I can gather info weather the project has any chance
> to settle in the commons at the first place.
>
> The project is completely different from other
> commons projects, because it contains platform nat
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > s...@apache.org wrote:
> > >
> > > We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were
> inserted
> > > earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
> >
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > s...@apache.org wrote:
> > >
> > > We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were
> inserted
> > > earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
> >
sebb wrote:
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote:
We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were inserted
earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
larger expressions resulting in incorrect values. Could be later JDKs
h
sebb wrote:
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
s...@apache.org wrote:
We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were inserted
earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
larger expressions resulting in incorrect values. Could be later JDKs
h
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were inserted
> earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
> larger expressions resulting in incorrect values. Could be later JDKs
> handle a
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were inserted
> earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int computations in
> larger expressions resulting in incorrect values. Could be later JDKs
> handle a
s...@apache.org wrote:
We need to be careful with removing all of these casts. They were
inserted earlier to eliminate some errors resulting from int/int
computations in larger expressions resulting in incorrect values.
Could be later JDKs handle all of this seamlessly, but I would prefer t
sebb wrote:
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
sebb wrote:
The code already uses some 1.5 features, e.g. enum and autoboxing. It
also already uses parameterized types, just not everywhere. I think
it's too late for compile-time compatibility with 1.4.
That is not what I mean
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > The code already uses some 1.5 features, e.g. enum and autoboxing. It
> > also already uses parameterized types, just not everywhere. I think
> > it's too late for compile-time compatibility with 1.4.
> >
> >
> That is not what I meant. I mea
On 05/04/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
>
> > On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> sebb wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
sebb wrote:
The code already uses some 1.5 features, e.g. enum and autoboxing. It
also already uses parameterized types, just not everywhere. I think
it's too late for compile-time compatibility with 1.4.
That is not what I meant. I meant that I want the upgrade to involve
the least possible
sebb a écrit :
> On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
sebb wrote:
> On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
+1
Luc
Matt Benson a écrit :
> I would be +1 to include this in Commons.
>
> -Matt
>
> --- On Sat, 4/4/09, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> From: Mladen Turk
>> Subject: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime
>> To: "Commons Developers List"
>> Date: Saturday, April 4, 2009, 2:21 A
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
On 05/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 04/04/2009, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
24 matches
Mail list logo
