Re: [VFS] 2.0 release

Stick one in the m2 snapshot repository on p.o.a and point Configuration to that. There's no release process for those, they're akin to nightly builds. Hen On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > If we aren't going to release real soon is there any process for publishing > a SNAPS

Re: Robust-Task introduction

Hi, Christian. Thanks for you opinion, advice and interest. > At least you'll have to invest some time. If you start you better take a long breath and learn to be patient :-) Yes, I see. However, I am concerned about it. > The API you proposed itself looks interesting - can you explain t

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

On Mar 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem wit

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

Ralph Goers schrieb: I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code in

Re: Commons Incubator proposal

Matt Benson wrote: > > Funnily enough I mentioned this the other day, then ran across the > original proposal doc on my laptop. Though I was correct in my > recollection that there was not a lot of interest, I failed to recall > having made a final appeal for any naysayers to speak up, and in th

Re: [VFS] 2.0 release

Jörg Schaible wrote: > Sergey Vladimirov wrote: > >> Personally, I would like to see some issues to be resolved before 2.0 >> release, because they can create incompatibility with previous releases >> in some way. >> - VFS-169 is the example of such issue (changing default behavior of >> toString

Re: [Configuration] Dependency on VFS

Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on > because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not > been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any > problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checkin

[Configuration] Dependency on VFS

I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code in as soon as I get

Re: [configuration] Local lookup fix & enhancement

Hi Oliver, Oliver Heger wrote: > Jörg Schaible schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> OK then, so don't be surprised if I start to commit. I will have to make >>> me familiar with the experimental branch first though. >>> >>> Oliver Heger wrote: >>> I am fine w

Commons Incubator proposal

Funnily enough I mentioned this the other day, then ran across the original proposal doc on my laptop. Though I was correct in my recollection that there was not a lot of interest, I failed to recall having made a final appeal for any naysayers to speak up, and in that it was apparently I who

Re: p.a.o m2 snapshot repo

--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > From: Siegfried Goeschl > Subject: Re: p.a.o m2 snapshot repo > To: "Commons Developers List" > Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 5:15 AM > Hi Matt, > > if you talk about > > scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-reposito

Re: [compress] Todos before release 1

Dennis Lundberg wrote: > Siegfried Goeschl wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or >> two favours already for maven-related help > > If I can persuade my employer to let me go to ApacheCon, we could do it > together :-) Unfortunately

[VFS] Couple of minor changes for inclusion in 2.0?

Hi, I see some discussion on the list re. a release of VFS. Any chance someone could review the following two (minor) FTP-related improvements/bugs and consider their inclusion: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-187 Allow configuration of FTP remote verification https://issues.apache.org/

Re: [jira] Created: (CONFIGURATION-377) SubnodeConfiguration does not interpolate local keys

Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: > Joerg, did you run the Maven build after you made these changes? > SubnodeConfiguration wouldn't compile (I fixed that). Also, now one of > the unit tests is failing - although I can't be completely sure it is > due to the changes you made. It was late night and ac

Re: p.a.o m2 snapshot repo

Hi Matt, if you talk about scp://people.apache.org/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository and an M2 commons project that the following statement will help mvn -Pci deploy Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Matt Benson wrote: > While we think over the Nexus issue, can anyone guide me in pub

Re: Robust-Task introduction

Hi, > however, I am worrying about I don`t have 'commit authority' when > it goes to sandbox. > So, I`d like to know how to obtain 'commit authority' when it goes to > sandbox. Is it possible? here are two interesting links for you: http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html http://common

Re: Robust-Task introduction

--- On Sun, 3/22/09, Min Cha wrote: > From: Min Cha > Subject: Re: Robust-Task introduction > To: "Commons Developers List" > Cc: "incubator-general" > Date: Sunday, March 22, 2009, 12:49 AM > Hi, Matt. > Thanks for your interest and opinion. > > As you said, this is food for thought. Honest

Re: [Note of Intent] CLI2 -> Sandbox

On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 16:17 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote: > cli2 is now in the sandbox. > > Website will be at: http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/cli2/ > SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/cli2/trunk > > cli 1.x is now the trunk. > > Website will be updated at: http://commons.a