I'd like to add a comment to my vote :) Compress seems to have a
momentum at the moment from several committer and contributors. I
haven't been looking at the quality of patches/contributions submitted
but I would hope that the committers involved would be looking to
propose people to become commit
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar
>> wrote:
>>> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
>>
>> I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted
Hi Christian,
if Dennis has no time I can help out during Hackathon - I owe him one or
two favours already for maven-related help
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since everybody seems to agree to promoting compress I collected several
> todos.
> I would like
I'm trying a (local) reintegrate merge first. In theory that should preserve
trunk's changes...
-Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, James Carman wrote:
> From: James Carman
> Subject: Re: [collections] jdk5 branch
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 3:57 PM
> As long as
As long as you've got any changes from trunk that you need in your
branch, I'd say just copy the stuff around (copy trunk to a branch and
copy your branch over to trunk).
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> Honestly, I don't rightly know. I suppose I could try a merge locally
Honestly, I don't rightly know. I suppose I could try a merge locally and see
how painful it is. Otherwise I suppose the alternative is to make sure all
trunk-to-branch catch-up merges are done atomically and extremely
informatively, then replace?
-Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, James Carman wr
Are you going to merge or just replace?
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make
> sure any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to
> have a look at it in case I'm on crack.
>
> -
I think this guy is getting ready to be merged back to trunk after I make sure
any trunk changes are merged over. It'd be great if anybody wanted to have a
look at it in case I'm on crack.
-Matt
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
+1
Oliver
Stefan Bodewig schrieb:
Hi all,
since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
on the old Jakarta template:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=markup&
Hi, Michael.
[lang] has been officially marked as targeting 1.5 in its m2 pom, so I suppose
you should feel free to let the patches fly.
Regards,
Matt
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Michael Wooten wrote:
> From: Michael Wooten
> Subject: [lang] Developer interested in common-lang project
> To: dev@c
Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on the old Jakarta template:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/PROPOSAL.txt?view=marku
Hi.
I am very interested in contributing to the commons-lang project, but would
like to know the state of it. I've seen several posts in JIRA and in the
developer mailing list about LangTwo and moving to Java 5.0 for version 3.0.
The projects I work on for my company have either moved to Java 6.0,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar
> wrote:
>> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
>
> I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this
> way on the SCXML promotion then it would never have got
+1 knowing that most ad-hoc attempts to implement archive handling is
broken ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> since I'm unsure whether a PROPOSAL is needed for existing sandbox
> components as old as compress I tried to be save and created one based
> on th
+1
On 13/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > +1 from me.
>
> Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
> is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
>
>
> > If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promo
On 13/03/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> >> One more try :)
> >>
> >> Stating that the Java version is 1.4 on the website will be done
> >> post-release (I'm going to split the CLI and CLI2 websites).
>
>
> >
On 2009-03-13, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> +1 from me.
Thanks Niall, I was already fearing the vote would fail since Torsten
is on vacation so he won't be able to vote either.
> If only pmc members planning to contribute vote +1 to promotions then
> we should probably shut down the sandbox because
+1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
--- On Fri, 3/13/09, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> From: Niall Pemberton
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Compress to Commons Proper
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 6:40 AM
> +1 from me.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Henri Yandell
> wrote:
> > +0 (meaning I'm
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> +0, no cycles for [compress] here either ATM.
I make the same point to you I made to Henri. If people had voted this
way on the SCXML promotion then it would never have got out of the
sandbox (and that would have been a shame IMO).
Niall
>
+1 from me.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +0 (meaning I'm in favour, but as I don't plan to be involved in the
> short term then I won't vote +1; this being one of the few votes where
> I think a +1 = "Yes and I'm going to volunteer time").
If only pmc members planning
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 21:00 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
[ . . . ]
> The site is the CLI2 site. Post release I'm going to create a CLI-1
> site and split the two, demoting the CLI2 site to the sandbox. Anyone
> at Apache will then be open to digging in on CLI2 and bringing it to a
> release state.
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
