> Yep. We'll probably start using the component in Tika as soon as a
> release is available, and through Tika the code will soon find it's
> way to wider use in projects like Solr and Jackrabbit. I wouldn't be
> surprised if these uses resulted in at least a few contributions
> trickling back to he
On 2009-03-09, sebb wrote:
> On 09/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> before I start a vote, let's see whether everything is in place.
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette says:
>> * compliance with policies:
>> Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdoc/st
+1
Builds and tests on Sun Java 1.6.0_12 on Windows XP SP3.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:41 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons CLI 1.2 (RC5)
One more shot :)
Tag:
https://svn.apache
One more shot :)
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC5
Site remains unchanged:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/cli/1.2/RC5/staged/commons-cli/commons-cli/1.2/
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> We currently have three developers listed (Sebb, you may want to add
> yourself) and two pretty active contributors as well as a request
> for promotion/release by Jukka. Doesn't sound too bad to me.
Yep. We'll probably start using
Sounds good to me :)
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> before I start a vote, let's see whether everything is in place.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette says:
>
> * compliance with policies:
>
> Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdo
>> Sebb, you mean adding headers to the files in the archives? :)
>
> No, I was referring to SVN.
Me too
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/src/test/resources
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
On 09/03/2009, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >> Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
> >> as well as a few test files. I could fix the CSS (other proper
> >> project's don't have a license in the one-liner file either, BTW)
> >> but the test files should be fine
I don't know how this page is generated, but it seems to reflect the
current state:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#commons-pmc
Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> Who is on the Apache Commons Project Management Committee? (Google has
> failed me.)
>
> I see this http://commons.apache.org/char
>> Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
>> as well as a few test files. I could fix the CSS (other proper
>> project's don't have a license in the one-liner file either, BTW)
>> but the test files should be fine without the license IMHO.
>
> Usually OK if thes
On 09/03/2009, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> before I start a vote, let's see whether everything is in place.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette says:
>
> * compliance with policies:
>
> Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
> as well as a
Yep, branches are cheap. This is a good approach!
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> My strategy with Lang btw is to just develop it and see what the API
> looks like at the end. We spend too much time worrying about the
> version number up front :)
>
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Mar 9
Hi all,
before I start a vote, let's see whether everything is in place.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette says:
* compliance with policies:
Just now I've run RAT and it flags src/site/xdoc/style/project.css
as well as a few test files. I could fix the CSS (other proper
pro
My strategy with Lang btw is to just develop it and see what the API
looks like at the end. We spend too much time worrying about the
version number up front :)
Hen
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Liam Coughlin wrote:
> That makes a little more sense then how I read the Stephen originally, and
>
That makes a little more sense then how I read the Stephen originally, and
yes you're probably right -- though I don't think you're going to be able to
get much varargs in without wrecking binary anyway since a lot of the
parameter ordering doesn't lend itself to it.
I just don't feel that a 1.3 j
15 matches
Mail list logo
