Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> My status: I started with implementing on that this morning and >> figured out that its not a very easy task. Even when I have it >> finished in a good time, there should be a good amount of testing >> imho. > > we could label that part of the API unstable/experimental - or leave > it out of the

Re: svn commit: r748288 - /commons/sandbox/compress/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/zip/AbstractUnicodeExtraField.java

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, wrote: > Fix set() methods that do not actually work. Ouch. Thanks! Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2009-02-26, Jukka Zitting wrote: >>> I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly >>> what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. >> If you pick up the latest code fro

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> I'm not sure about the status of Christian's work on changeset >>> support.  1.0 should have a stable API, at least, IMHO. >> We could maybe leave out the changeset support for a 1.0. > My status: I started with implementing on that this morning and

Re: [math] redesigning the optimization/estimation packages (phase 2)

2009-02-26 Thread Ted Dunning
Here is what I would do in R to do a linear model with observations consisting of input variables x1 ... x3 and target variable y: m <- lm(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data) The first argument lets me supply the form of the regression. I could have regressed on log(x3), for instance, or used x1*x2 + x

Re: [math] redesigning the optimization/estimation packages (phase 2)

2009-02-26 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Ted Dunning a écrit : > Hmmm... > > I may have misunderstood our conversation (and therefore probably sounded a > bit incoherent), but I was talking about weights on observations which may > or may not be what you are talking about here. This is exactly what I am talking about. > > Also, if you

Re: [math] redesigning the optimization/estimation packages (phase 2)

2009-02-26 Thread Ted Dunning
Hmmm... I may have misunderstood our conversation (and therefore probably sounded a bit incoherent), but I was talking about weights on observations which may or may not be what you are talking about here. Also, if you *are* talking about the same thing and the vector is a vector of residuals suc

[math] redesigning the optimization/estimation packages (phase 2)

2009-02-26 Thread Luc Maisonobe
I have just checked in the first changes as discussed on the list. The changes are merely code moved from one package to another. The new packages are optimization.direct, optimization.general, optimization.linear (empty for now) and optimization.univariate. The removed packages are analysis.minim

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> I'm not sure about the status of Christian's work on changeset >> support.  1.0 should have a stable API, at least, IMHO. > > We could maybe leave out the changeset support for a 1.0. My status: I started with implementing on that this morning and figured out that its not a very easy task. Even

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-26, Jukka Zitting wrote: >> I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly >> what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. > > If you pick up the latest code from Ant instead you'll see they are > the same

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Torsten Curdt wrote: > Just wondering: are you planing on using compress from ant then? No. I'll probably start and Antlib based on compress that will provide cpio and ar tasks, but for the existing tasks we'll keep our own codebase, I guess. At least I have no plans of changing

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Torsten Curdt
> I'm not sure about the status of Christian's work on changeset > support.  1.0 should have a stable API, at least, IMHO. We could maybe leave out the changeset support for a 1.0. > And I have absolutely no clue about the ar and cpio packages. ar is coming from jdeb http://vafer.org/projects/jd

Re: [compress] State of encoding support in ZIP package

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Wolfgang Glas wrote: > Thanks for your tremendous work on finishing ZIP encoding support ;-) I had a good base to start from, thank you. 8-) > Stefan Bodewig schrieb: >> * documentation (will tackle that next) > May I help you at this point ? Any help anywhere is appreciated

Re: [compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Jukka Zitting wrote: > I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly > what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. If you pick up the latest code from Ant instead you'll see they are the same 8-) They even are used by projects during Gump runs while compress i

[compress] Schedule for a release?

2009-02-26 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, I looked at the compress component in the sandbox and it's exactly what we could use in Apache Tika, see [1]. What's the current status of the codebase? Any plans of graduation to Commons proper and of doing a 1.0 release? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-204 BR, Jukka Zittin

Re: [compress] State of encoding support in ZIP package

2009-02-26 Thread Wolfgang Glas
Hi Stefan, Thanks for your tremendous work on finishing ZIP encoding support ;-) Stefan Bodewig schrieb: > Hi all, > > a quick update and a question on defaults: [snip] > * documentation (will tackle that next) May I help you at this point ? > * ZipArchiveInputStream - SANDBOX-293 Well, Z

[compress] State of encoding support in ZIP package

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, a quick update and a question on defaults: ZipArchiveOutputStream now writes UTF-8 by default and sets the language encoding flag. It can be told to create InfoZIP UnicodeExtraFields but doesn't do so by default. ZipFile now recognized the language encoding flag and parses the names as

Re: [compress] Archiver Detection fails

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> Note that the method (or better the input stream) is still broken in a >> more general sense since it will not detect self extracting ZIP files >> which do have a tiny native bootstrapper tacked to the front of the >> archive.  The ZipFile class can re

Re: [compress] Archiver Detection fails

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2009-02-26, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> I recently figured out that a compress created zip file doesn't >> necessary match the signature of >> ZipArchiveInputStream.matches(...) > This is because the method is wrong - will be "fixed" in a few > minut

Re: [compress] Archiver Detection fails

2009-02-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Thanks Stefan. I allready thought that you can identify the problem within a short time. > Note that the method (or better the input stream) is still broken in a > more general sense since it will not detect self extracting ZIP files > which do have a tiny native bootstrapper tacked to the front o

Re: [compress] Archiver Detection fails

2009-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2009-02-26, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I recently figured out that a compress created zip file doesn't > necessary match the signature of > ZipArchiveInputStream.matches(...) This is because the method is wrong - will be "fixed" in a few minutes, see below. The expected signature right now